From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yoshinori Sato Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] Revert h8300 archtecture support Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:09:49 +0900 Message-ID: <87mw3lmfxu.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> References: <1425890830-29399-1-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> <20150310055522.GA9699@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mail2.asahi-net.or.jp ([202.224.39.198]:64287 "EHLO mail2.asahi-net.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbbCJIJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:09:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150310055522.GA9699@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org At Mon, 9 Mar 2015 22:55:22 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: Thanks comment. > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:46:54PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I rewriting h8300 support. > > > It might possibly be better to use the term "re-introduce" instead of > rewrite or revert (as in the headline). > > Also, > s/archtecture/architecture/ > > in the headline. OK. It's corrected next. > Given that the reason for dropping the architecture in the first place was > the lack of an active maintainer, I am somewhat surprised that you don't > add one to the MAINTAINERS file. Oh. I add next. > Guenter -- Yoshinori Sato