From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: add finit_module syscall to asm-generic Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:47:40 +0930 Message-ID: <87mx0knmpn.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20120920200702.GA18807@www.outflux.net> <201209202152.38630.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201209202152.38630.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann , Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Thursday 20 September 2012, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> This adds the finit_module syscall to the generic syscall list. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> --- >> This depends on the finit_module patchset in Rusty's tree, based on >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/7/559 > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Please queue this along with the other patches. OK, I'm still holding them back from linux-next due to the question of signatures & the new syscall. But I expect we'll resign ourselves to an appended signature, and they'll be fine as-is. Cheers, Rusty. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:45776 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756856Ab2IUDEQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:04:16 -0400 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: add finit_module syscall to asm-generic In-Reply-To: <201209202152.38630.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20120920200702.GA18807@www.outflux.net> <201209202152.38630.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:47:40 +0930 Message-ID: <87mx0knmpn.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann , Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20120921021740.pl5veCMgo9e948xGpvwkE3mpxl_vLkRSM58eZXW-i78@z> Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Thursday 20 September 2012, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> This adds the finit_module syscall to the generic syscall list. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> --- >> This depends on the finit_module patchset in Rusty's tree, based on >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/7/559 > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Please queue this along with the other patches. OK, I'm still holding them back from linux-next due to the question of signatures & the new syscall. But I expect we'll resign ourselves to an appended signature, and they'll be fine as-is. Cheers, Rusty.