From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] compiler/gcc: Raise minimum GCC version for kernel builds to 4.8 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:34:10 +1100 Message-ID: <87tv4jhljx.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> References: <20200123153341.19947-1-will@kernel.org> <20200123153341.19947-10-will@kernel.org> <20200124082637.GZ14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:52565 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725710AbgAYKeN (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 05:34:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nick Desaulniers , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon , LKML , linux-arch , kernel-team , Linus Torvalds , Segher Boessenkool , Christian Borntraeger , Luc Van Oostenryck , Arnd Bergmann , Peter Oberparleiter , Masahiro Yamada Nick Desaulniers writes: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:26 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:36:37AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:34 AM Will Deacon wrote: >> > > It is very rare to see versions of GCC prior to 4.8 being used to build >> > > the mainline kernel. These old compilers are also know to have codegen >> > > issues which can lead to silent miscompilation: >> > > >> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145 >> > > >> > > Raise the minimum GCC version for kernel build to 4.8 and remove some >> > > tautological Kconfig dependencies as a consequence. >> > > >> > > Cc: Nick Desaulniers >> > >> > Thanks for the patch. >> > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers >> > I wouldn't mind if this patch preceded the earlier one in the series >> > adding the warning, should the series require a v2 and if folks are >> > generally ok with bumping the min version. >> >> If I hadn't actually read your reply, I would have never spotted that >> reviewed-by tag, hidden in a blob of text like that. >> >> Adding some whitespace before and after, such that it stands out a >> little more, might avoid such issues. > > Ack. Do maintainers have tools for fetching patch series and > automating collecting Reviewed-by tags, or is it all extremely manual? Patchwork collects them for you. But not all maintainers use patchwork, it's a bit new and trendy ;) cheers