From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yoshinori Sato Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] h8300: Process and signal Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:09:57 +0900 Message-ID: <87wq3hko8q.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> References: <1423986573-2329-1-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> <1423986573-2329-6-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Weinberger Cc: LKML , Linux-Arch List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org At Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:38:25 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Yoshinori Sato > wrote: > > + usig = current_thread_info()->exec_domain > > + && current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap > > + && sig < 32 > > + ? current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig] > > + : sig; > > Does h8300 really need signal mapping? > I'm very sure you can drop this. > In fact I'm working in patch set to rip it out tree wide as we have > only a single (broken) > in-tree user. > I agree. It remove forgot. > -- > Thanks, > //richard -- Yoshinori Sato From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.asahi-net.or.jp ([202.224.39.198]:63610 "EHLO mail2.asahi-net.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754886AbbBQHjY (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 02:39:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:09:57 +0900 Message-ID: <87wq3hko8q.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> From: Yoshinori Sato Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] h8300: Process and signal In-Reply-To: References: <1423986573-2329-1-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> <1423986573-2329-6-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Richard Weinberger Cc: LKML , Linux-Arch Message-ID: <20150217070957.j7WJ7db2ITwcTlitgAVXYVPYIejpYjlD-JVAZV1ZIU4@z> At Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:38:25 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Yoshinori Sato > wrote: > > + usig = current_thread_info()->exec_domain > > + && current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap > > + && sig < 32 > > + ? current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig] > > + : sig; > > Does h8300 really need signal mapping? > I'm very sure you can drop this. > In fact I'm working in patch set to rip it out tree wide as we have > only a single (broken) > in-tree user. > I agree. It remove forgot. > -- > Thanks, > //richard -- Yoshinori Sato