From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, keescook@chromium.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, sstabellini@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/26] locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 23:03:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96d6930b-78b1-4b4c-63e3-c385a764d6e3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230522122429.1915021-25-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Hi Mark,
Thank you for the nice documentation improvements!
Please see inline comments for minor nits.
On Mon, 22 May 2023 13:24:27 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently the atomics are documented in Documentation/atomic_t.txt, and
> have no kerneldoc comments. There are a sufficient number of gotchas
> (e.g. semantics, noinstr-safety) that it would be nice to have comments
> to call these out, and it would be nice to have kerneldoc comments such
> that these can be collated.
>
> While it's possible to derive the semantics from the code, this can be
> painful given the amount of indirection we currently have (e.g. fallback
> paths), and it's easy to be mislead by naming, e.g.
>
> * The unconditional void-returning ops *only* have relaxed variants
> without a _relaxed suffix, and can easily be mistaken for being fully
> ordered.
>
> It would be nice to give these a _relaxed() suffix, but this would
> result in significant churn throughout the kernel.
>
> * Our naming of conditional and unconditional+test ops is rather
> inconsistent, and it can be difficult to derive the name of an
> operation, or to identify where an op is conditional or
> unconditional+test.
>
> Some ops are clearly conditional:
> - dec_if_positive
> - add_unless
> - dec_unless_positive
> - inc_unless_negative
>
> Some ops are clearly unconditional+test:
> - sub_and_test
> - dec_and_test
> - inc_and_test
>
> However, what exactly those test is not obvious. A _test_zero suffix
> might be clearer.
>
> Others could be read ambiguously:
> - inc_not_zero // conditional
> - add_negative // unconditional+test
>
> It would probably be worth renaming these, e.g. to inc_unless_zero and
> add_test_negative.
>
> As a step towards making this more consistent and easier to understand,
> this patch adds kerneldoc comments for all generated *atomic*_*()
> functions. These are generated from templates, with some common text
> shared, making it easy to extend these in future if necessary.
>
> I've tried to make these as consistent and clear as possible, and I've
> deliberately ensured:
>
> * All ops have their ordering explicitly mentioned in the short and long
> description.
>
> * All test ops have "test" in their short description.
>
> * All ops are described as an expression using their usual C operator.
> For example:
>
> andnot: "Atomically updates @v to (@v & ~@i)"
The kernel-doc script converts "~@i" into reST source of "~**i**",
where the emphasis of i is not recognized by Sphinx.
For the "@" to work as expected, please say "~(@i)" or "~ @i".
My preference is the former.
> inc: "Atomically updates @v to (@v + 1)"
>
> Which may be clearer to non-naative English speakers, and allows all
non-native
> the operations to be described in the same style.
>
> * All conditional ops have their condition described as an expression
> using the usual C operators. For example:
>
> add_unless: "If (@v != @u), atomically updates @v to (@v + @i)"
> cmpxchg: "If (@v == @old), atomically updates @v to @new"
>
> Which may be clearer to non-naative English speakers, and allows all
Ditto.
> the operations to be described in the same style.
>
> * All bitwise ops (and,andnot,or,xor) explicitly mention that they are
> bitwise in their short description, so that they are not mistaken for
> performing their logical equivalents.
>
> * The noinstr safety of each op is explicitly described, with a
> description of whether or not to use the raw_ form of the op.
>
> There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
>
> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Thanks, Akira
> ---
> include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h | 1848 +++++++++++-
> include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h | 2771 +++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h | 925 +++++-
> scripts/atomic/atomic-tbl.sh | 112 +-
> scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-fallback.sh | 2 +
> scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-instrumented.sh | 2 +
> scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-long.sh | 2 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/add | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/add_negative | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/add_unless | 18 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/and | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/andnot | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/cmpxchg | 14 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec_and_test | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec_if_positive | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec_unless_positive | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc_and_test | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc_not_zero | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc_unless_negative | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/or | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/read | 12 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/set | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/sub | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/sub_and_test | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/try_cmpxchg | 15 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/xchg | 13 +
> scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/xor | 13 +
> 29 files changed, 5940 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/add
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/add_negative
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/add_unless
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/and
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/andnot
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/cmpxchg
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec_and_test
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec_if_positive
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/dec_unless_positive
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc_and_test
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc_not_zero
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/inc_unless_negative
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/or
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/read
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/set
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/sub
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/sub_and_test
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/try_cmpxchg
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/xchg
> create mode 100644 scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/xor
>
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-22 12:24 [PATCH 00/26] locking/atomic: restructuring + kerneldoc Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 01/26] locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 02/26] locking/atomic: remove fallback comments Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 03/26] locking/atomic: hexagon: remove redundant arch_atomic_cmpxchg Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 04/26] locking/atomic: make atomic*_{cmp,}xchg optional Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 05/26] locking/atomic: arc: add preprocessor symbols Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 06/26] locking/atomic: arm: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 07/26] locking/atomic: hexagon: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 08/26] locking/atomic: m68k: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 09/26] locking/atomic: parisc: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 10/26] locking/atomic: sh: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 11/26] locking/atomic: sparc: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 12/26] locking/atomic: x86: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 13/26] locking/atomic: xtensa: " Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 14/26] locking/atomic: scripts: remove bogus order parameter Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 15/26] locking/atomic: scripts: remove leftover "${mult}" Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 16/26] locking/atomic: scripts: factor out order template generation Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 18/26] locking/atomic: treewide: use raw_atomic*_<op>() Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 19/26] locking/atomic: scripts: build raw_atomic_long*() directly Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 21/26] locking/atomic: scripts: split pfx/name/sfx/order Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 22/26] locking/atomic: scripts: simplify raw_atomic_long*() definitions Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 25/26] locking/atomic: docs: Add atomic operations to the driver basic API documentation Mark Rutland
2023-05-24 14:10 ` Akira Yokosawa
2023-05-30 12:33 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 12:24 ` [PATCH 26/26] locking/atomic: treewide: delete arch_atomic_*() kerneldoc Mark Rutland
2023-05-22 20:58 ` [PATCH 00/26] locking/atomic: restructuring + kerneldoc Kees Cook
[not found] ` <20230522122429.1915021-25-mark.rutland@arm.com>
2023-05-24 14:03 ` Akira Yokosawa [this message]
2023-05-24 14:11 ` [PATCH 24/26] locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 3:17 ` Akira Yokosawa
2023-05-26 4:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-05-26 10:27 ` Akira Yokosawa
2023-05-26 15:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-05-30 12:42 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-24 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96d6930b-78b1-4b4c-63e3-c385a764d6e3@gmail.com \
--to=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox