From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb() Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:45:45 +0000 Message-ID: <9933.1226105145@redhat.com> References: <20081108001555.GE18378@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20081107003816.9b0f947a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081107052336.652868737@polymtl.ca> <20081107053349.861709786@polymtl.ca> <20081106220530.5b0e3a96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <25363.1226056819@redhat.com> <20081107164758.GB22134@Krystal> <20081107201118.GB28600@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20081107213610.GC2654@Krystal> <9405.1226101315@redhat.com> Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47043 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751390AbYKHAqf (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:46:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081108001555.GE18378@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Russell King Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Nicolas Pitre , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, David Miller , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Russell King wrote: > It sounds to me as if the right answer is for it to move back to being an > ARM private thing with a MN10300 private copy, rather than it pretending > to be something everyone can use. The only problem I have with that is that there are then two independent copies of it:-( David