From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Link breakage on all architectures which implement their own show_mem
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:38:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi==Ddg-Dx6w==MG4f4rbvLXCxY1c9NieitJctJC@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103241520120.26730@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:21 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
>
>> This is the problem a lot of architectures will see:
>>
>> Specifically this:
>> LD vmlinux.o
>> lib/lib.a(show_mem.o): In function `show_mem':
>> (.text.show_mem+0x0): multiple definition of `show_mem'
>> arch/parisc/mm/built-in.o:(.text.show_mem+0x0): first defined here
>> make: *** [vmlinux.o] Error 1
>>
>> Caused by this patch:
>>
>> commit ddd588b5dd55f14320379961e47683db4e4c1d90
>> Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>> Date: Tue Mar 22 16:30:46 2011 -0700
>>
>> oom: suppress nodes that are not allowed from meminfo on oom kill
>>
>> Is the cause. What it does is introduce a new __show_mem() which is
>> required by files in mm/, so the object containing it: show_mem.o gets
>> pulled in all the time in the link and that gives every architecture
>> that implements their own show_mem() a link failure because of the
>> double definition. Library linking works at the file level, not at the
>> function level. To work, you have to put these functions in separate
>> files.
>>
>
> Thanks for the report, James.
>
> This was also reported by Stephen on LKML when he merged the latest Linus
> tree into linux-next. Andrew suggested that we remove __show_mem()
> entirely and simply add its argument to show_mem() in all the
> architectures. I have a patch at:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130100511521954
>
> I don't have a parisc cross compiler, so if you could try it out and add
> your Tested-by that would be great
You can find basic cross compilers for a variety of architectures
already built here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-25 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 16:41 Link breakage on all architectures which implement their own show_mem James Bottomley
2011-03-24 22:21 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-25 14:13 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-25 20:02 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-25 18:38 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2011-03-25 10:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-03-25 14:11 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi==Ddg-Dx6w==MG4f4rbvLXCxY1c9NieitJctJC@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).