From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] mm: Preemptibility -v4 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:19:31 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20100828141637.421594670@chello.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:55760 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752234Ab0H1PTe (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:19:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100828141637.421594670@chello.nl> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Thomas Gleixner , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Nick Piggin , Paul McKenney , Yanmin Zhang , Stephen Rothwell Hi Peter, On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Yanmin ran the last posting through the comprehensive Intel test farm > and didn't find any regressions. Is there data somewhere that shows where this helps and how much? Pekka