From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: LMB bits Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:11:57 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4C38DDE3.9010303@kernel.org> <1278905081.28659.157.camel@pasglop> <1278920286.28659.194.camel@pasglop> <20100712.153455.108790468.davem@davemloft.net> <1279005164.28659.407.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:52940 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756855Ab0GMPMU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:12:20 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com (mail-gw0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id o6DFC49n011521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:12:19 -0700 Received: by gwj18 with SMTP id 18so2758538gwj.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:11:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1279005164.28659.407.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: David Miller , yinghai@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Ingo, Linus, how to you want to proceed ? We could get the rename patch > in now, that would make things easier for the ARM folks who have started > using LMB as well and are currently clashing in linux-next, and keep the > rest of the rework for the merge window ? Or keep the whole thing for > the merge window ? If it's just a rename, and the accidental lmb renames have been all sorted out, then I'm ok with taking a pure rename that changes nothing else now, just to make things easier to merge later. Linus