From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Percival Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fcntl.h comment: Fix typo regarding O_SYNC Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:51:16 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1279214957-10235-2-git-send-email-ted@tedp.id.au> <1279214957-10235-1-git-send-email-ted@tedp.id.au> <8130.1279274430@redhat.com> <20100716115639.GA16707@shareable.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:54070 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758829Ab0GPUvR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:51:17 -0400 Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so2991261vws.19 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100716115639.GA16707@shareable.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jamie Lokier Cc: David Howells , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Jamie Lokier wrote: > David Howells wrote: >> >> Ted Percival wrote: >> >> > +/* open/fcntl - O_SYNC is only implemented on block devices and o= n files >> > =A0 =A0 located on an ext2 file system */ >> >> Is this comment still true about the fact that, with respect to file= s, this is >> only implemented on ext2? > > No, it isn't. Christoph Hellwig has since removed that comment (commit 6b2f3d1f, "vfs: Implement proper O_SYNC semantics") so this patch (2/2) can be ignored.