From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akinobu Mita Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/24] arm: introduce little-endian bitops Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:36:09 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1295183333-13802-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> <1295183333-13802-6-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> <20110116175109.GC13615@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:36596 "EHLO mail-qy0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751515Ab1AQCgK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:36:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110116175109.GC13615@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Akinobu Mita , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org 2011/1/17 Russell King : > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:08:34PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: >> Introduce little-endian bit operations by renaming native ext2 bit >> operations. =A0The ext2 bit operations are kept as wrapper macros us= ing >> little-endian bit operations to maintain bisectability until the >> conversions are finished. > > This looks fine to me - is there any chance we can get this in to mai= nline > so we can avoid conflicts between this and some patches I'm working o= n atm > to fix the unsafe UP+SMP kernel combination with ARMs bitops ? The le bitops is still unacceptable to mainline. So please do the fixes without bothering about the conflict.