From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akinobu Mita Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] bitops: remove minix bitops from asm/bitops.h Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:40:03 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1287135981-17604-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> <1287135981-17604-23-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> <201010151253.15653.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:51917 "EHLO mail-qy0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754300Ab0JPMkE (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:40:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Andreas Schwab , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linux/m68k 2010/10/16 Geert Uytterhoeven : > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:50, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Geert Uytterhoeven writes: >> >>> Funny, m68k uses the little endian minix file system? >>> >>> Perhaps this was due to minix using the ext2 accessors? And ext2 being >>> switched from big to little endian ext2 on m68k, without anyone >>> noticing the impact >>> on minix? >> >> m68k has always used big-endian minixfs and the minix bitops were always >> independent of the ext2 ones. > > Thanks for confirming! m68knommu is big-endian minixfs but m68k (mmu) is little-endian minixfs if I read arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_{mm,no}.h correctly.