linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] math128: Introduce {mult,add,cmp}_u128
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:46:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx_efN7A2H2VuRGZiyh2xcV=p6uoDLcVAW2JOqmJJNd1Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335304497.28150.243.camel@twins>

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> that does generate slightly better code in that it avoids some masks on
> 64bit:
>
> @@ -7,12 +7,11 @@
>  .LFB38:
>        .cfi_startproc
>        movq    %rdi, %r8
> -       movq    %rdi, %rdx
>        movq    %rsi, %rcx
> +       mov     %edi, %edx
>        shrq    $32, %r8
> -       andl    $4294967295, %edx
>        shrq    $32, %rcx
> -       andl    $4294967295, %esi
> +       mov     %esi, %esi

Oh christ.

What insane version of gcc is that? Can you please make a gcc bug-report?

Because a compiler that generates an instruction sequence like

    movq %rdi,%rsi
    andl $4294967295, %esi

is just so fricking stupid that it's outright buggy. That's just
crazy. It's demented. It's an "and" with all bits set.

But yeah, I do think that in general using a cast to 32-bit instead of
a mask to 32-bit is easier for the compiler. Although that still is a
particularly stupid code sequence to use.

                     Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-25  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-24 16:10 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] gcc work-around and math128 Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] kernel,sched,time: Clean up gcc work-arounds Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:39   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-25  0:14   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-25  0:14     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] math128: Introduce {mult,add,cmp}_u128 Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-24 19:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 20:12     ` Måns Rullgård
2012-04-24 20:12       ` Måns Rullgård
2012-04-24 21:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25  0:09       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-25  1:46       ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2012-04-25  1:46         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-25  8:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 10:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25  0:23   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-25  8:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 11:23       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-25 11:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 14:35           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-25 15:09             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] math128, x86_64: Implement {mult,add}_u128 in 64bit asm Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:34   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 16:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 17:17       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 17:20           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 22:00             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 22:03               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] gcc work-around and math128 H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:27   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 21:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-04-24 21:18   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-24 21:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 21:35     ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-04-24 21:35       ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-04-24 21:51       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+55aFx_efN7A2H2VuRGZiyh2xcV=p6uoDLcVAW2JOqmJJNd1Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).