From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:41:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYkL2=gkBvbHO514rnppLdHgsXwi0==6Ovq43kSZqEvUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907153701.2981205-5-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi Arnd,
help me out here because I feel vaguely stupid...
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:38 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT))
> + return task_thread_info(task)->syscall & ~__NR_OABI_SYSCALL_BASE;
Where __NR_OABI_SYSCALL_BASE is
#define __NR_OABI_SYSCALL_BASE 0x900000
So you will end up with sycall number & FF6FFFFF
masking off bits 20 and 23.
I suppose this is based on this:
> bics r10, r10, #0xff000000
> + str r10, [tsk, #TI_SYSCALL]
OK we mask off bits 24-31 before we store this.
> bic scno, scno, #0xff000000 @ mask off SWI op-code
> + str scno, [tsk, #TI_SYSCALL]
And here too.
> eor scno, scno, #__NR_SYSCALL_BASE @ check OS number
And then happens that which will ... I don't know really.
Exclusive or with 0x9000000 is not immediately intuitive
evident to me, I suppose it is for everyone else... :/
I need some idea how this numberspace is managed in order to
understand the code so I can review it, I guess it all makes perfect
sense but I need some background here.
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-07 15:36 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: remove set_fs callers and implementation Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm/maccess: fix unaligned copy_{from,to}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-08 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-27 9:25 ` Linus Walleij
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: traps: use get_kernel_nofault instead of set_fs() Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-08 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 17:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-18 7:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-09-18 12:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: oabi-compat: add epoll_pwait handler Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-08 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-28 9:41 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2020-09-28 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-28 15:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: oabi-compat: rework epoll_wait/epoll_pwait emulation Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-08 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-08 20:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: oabi-compat: rework sys_semtimedop emulation Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: oabi-compat: rework fcntl64() emulation Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: uaccess: add __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: uaccess: remove set_fs() implementation Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-30 15:45 [PATCH v4 0/9] ARM: remove set_fs callers and implementation Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-30 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm/maccess: fix unaligned copy_{from,to}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-30 15:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-30 16:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-10-30 21:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACRpkdYkL2=gkBvbHO514rnppLdHgsXwi0==6Ovq43kSZqEvUQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).