From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B1DC388F2 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45B92087E for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="XOdrV8ei" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726589AbgKFJgV (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 04:36:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54172 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726578AbgKFJgV (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 04:36:21 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com (mail-lj1-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CD88C0613D2 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 01:36:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id o13so672575ljj.11 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 01:36:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=q326GXxs8YkWuvBRrekt++B5YyugaqPURgSA3otIq6U=; b=XOdrV8ei8AtuxGdV1ULzurTDZi9h0STRi4e6h9KSaQcs9JaVCAn0s20MSYRGsfiFhS cAQ5HcxJvNf0bcm1aZwo8OiJ6W0Fup+vqbs+neWVychssgU12cZHqou2LvwZxZ5+zw/O UbY+h3caECgBTLExtoKALN2LeSJxBz6tIItFeB7JXnns2q5n4Um4KSY+uNaYOmCdF167 NJtEYQhcNGeAodeU/Pg9ZM0jYbX3UIxHAPtpN3fZkoLi9Yo0dKHqYBv2dMTK3YUSmFaA IfnlybJGiKErfJm73wIsfRzvHBwMNHy3ybeANKJ4joxvD1nWgm+PtNMAh5sXYCS5e7k8 xGBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q326GXxs8YkWuvBRrekt++B5YyugaqPURgSA3otIq6U=; b=PMug+A8ghpyDLuQlHpRCp4ur9rweqsqv8JZFJAAoi0NaGLz7O13Mu5HxOKsnHNsqcN bnkmUo712fm4V7TETRkK6ku/YXPCjSo48DqqtQt7enqwuIT2oHJ9smSdDqyT28wAlbKU FWsLCa6qiF4Vf4Kgz1pmTzAgRfpP08yJDIqPDxeDpVk22PopAq+910gDjSsf7aagniUn 9c1erzUb9I9ohv+VVT3NGPL6zOAM2fXr7AYgTMRaQGnWuRydRz2Hy6s2KZj20T2JDFFt ILDd1a8oi3k4b0PamI41Sk5MEDithd9Bru6fU46CpFrUteUqbefeEFfEYA9b2nwglLLl XUJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V1Ixu3AKZrlfe+NXuOQpOlRBPUZOmxSv+R+QMOn35OsmZduuk yXC2zODi2+B/2sl7lrEz8krVLGYLpH+EdjdUpPsAJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzROlV5g3M3Pzjhr+1raVc/1hLidCyn5chZ4duWrpT16uo1Ir8x1bNuTAoV3x713D+qUJtWOjkKrtVhYQnc/ao= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:80d2:: with SMTP id r18mr465456ljg.286.1604655379127; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 01:36:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201030154519.1245983-1-arnd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20201030154519.1245983-1-arnd@kernel.org> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:36:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] ARM: remove set_fs callers and implementation To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Russell King , Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux ARM , Linux-Arch , Linux Memory Management List , Alexander Viro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:45 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This is the rebased version of my ARM set_fs patches on top of > v5.10-rc1, dropping the TASK_SIZE_MAX patch but leaving everything > else unchanged. > > I have tested the oabi-compat changes using the LTP tests for the three > modified syscalls using an Armv7 kernel and a Debian 5 OABI user space. I tested this patch set on the ARM Footbridge (SA110) with an ages old Red Hat Linux OABI userspace. It works. Tested-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij