From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ley Foon Tan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:33:33 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1410168160-3624-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <12538756.JybTPMqFHj@wuerfel> <3608975.MxU44B73lk@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3608975.MxU44B73lk@wuerfel> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Please add my 'Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann ' to this patch > once Thomas is ok with it. I think we had concluded already that it > was correct when we talked about it last time, but he doesn't seem > convinced yet so I want to wait for his reply. Okay, will wait response from Thomas first. BTW, this is the previous discussion thread for this generic futex: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1966564 > You definitely need an Ack for all patches touching code outside of > arch/nios2, from the respective maintainers. For the nios2 code, > having as many acks as you can helps, and I should probably take > a last look so I can ack the pull request when you send it. There are 4 patches that touching code outside of arch/nios2, including this patch. Do we have maintainers for common files for patch #15, #27 and #28 below? Can't find this info from MAINTAINERS file. It is good if you can take a look this v3 patchset so I can send pull request if no further issue. Thanks! [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP [PATCH v3 15/29] Add ELF machine define for Nios2 [PATCH v3 27/29] MAINTAINERS: Add nios2 maintainer [PATCH v3 28/29] Documentation: Add documentation for Nios2 architecture Ley Foon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:61924 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751001AbaIYIdf (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 04:33:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3608975.MxU44B73lk@wuerfel> References: <1410168160-3624-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <12538756.JybTPMqFHj@wuerfel> <3608975.MxU44B73lk@wuerfel> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:33:33 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP From: Ley Foon Tan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang , Thomas Gleixner Message-ID: <20140925083333.zyaC0mtlAJ8ZuMSzljbFsW6eMSSYDfMoWKJkyesEFmI@z> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Please add my 'Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann ' to this patch > once Thomas is ok with it. I think we had concluded already that it > was correct when we talked about it last time, but he doesn't seem > convinced yet so I want to wait for his reply. Okay, will wait response from Thomas first. BTW, this is the previous discussion thread for this generic futex: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1966564 > You definitely need an Ack for all patches touching code outside of > arch/nios2, from the respective maintainers. For the nios2 code, > having as many acks as you can helps, and I should probably take > a last look so I can ack the pull request when you send it. There are 4 patches that touching code outside of arch/nios2, including this patch. Do we have maintainers for common files for patch #15, #27 and #28 below? Can't find this info from MAINTAINERS file. It is good if you can take a look this v3 patchset so I can send pull request if no further issue. Thanks! [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP [PATCH v3 15/29] Add ELF machine define for Nios2 [PATCH v3 27/29] MAINTAINERS: Add nios2 maintainer [PATCH v3 28/29] Documentation: Add documentation for Nios2 architecture Ley Foon