From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 09/21] csky: VDSO and rt_sigreturn Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:13:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guo Ren Cc: Andrew Morton , Daniel Lezcano , David Miller , gregkh , Christoph Hellwig , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch , DTML , Rob Herring , c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:01 AM Guo Ren wrote: > > This patch adds files related to VDSO and our VDSO only support > rt_sigreturn. > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Cc: Arnd Bergmann I was a little worried about the VDSO because of the discussion we had about 64-bit time_t. Since there is no gettimeofday call in here, that's fine, so Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-f195.google.com ([209.85.222.195]:40716 "EHLO mail-qk1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727013AbeJQXJh (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:09:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:13:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 09/21] csky: VDSO and rt_sigreturn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Guo Ren Cc: Andrew Morton , Daniel Lezcano , David Miller , gregkh , Christoph Hellwig , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch , DTML , Rob Herring , c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com Message-ID: <20181017151311.lnYGVWx-_uGtaEzjX5KmIi_OSiAwbKzUWkWM6GmaGko@z> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:01 AM Guo Ren wrote: > > This patch adds files related to VDSO and our VDSO only support > rt_sigreturn. > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Cc: Arnd Bergmann I was a little worried about the VDSO because of the discussion we had about 64-bit time_t. Since there is no gettimeofday call in here, that's fine, so Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann