From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm: fix compiler warning by properly inlining flat_set_persistent()
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:53:17 -0300
Message-ID: <CALF0-+V3LcbXK_0Hi2G_j63qRwPceAuTq_bgwwCGpxicB=EXvQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1339229611-2326-1-git-send-email-elezegarcia@gmail.com>
	<1339229611-2326-2-git-send-email-elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:59250 "EHLO
	mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756489Ab2GCSxR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:53:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1339229611-2326-2-git-send-email-elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
> This patch removes the following warning:
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:752: warning: unused variable =91persistent=92
> There is neither change in functionality, nor extra code generated.
>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/flat.h |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/flat.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/flat.=
h
> index 59426a4..6ef6cc5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/flat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/flat.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@
>  #define        flat_get_addr_from_rp(rp, relval, flags, persistent) =
get_unaligned(rp)
>  #define        flat_put_addr_at_rp(rp, val, relval)    put_unaligned=
(val,rp)
>  #define        flat_get_relocate_addr(rel)             (rel)
> -#define        flat_set_persistent(relval, p)          0
> +
> +static inline int flat_set_persistent(unsigned long relval,
> +                                     unsigned long *persistent)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
>
>  #endif /* __ARM_FLAT_H__ */
> --
> 1.7.3.4
>

Is there something wrong with this patch preventing it from being appli=
ed?
Or did I send it to wrong list?

Thanks,
Ezequiel.