Re: [RFC PATCH V6 2/4 Resend] Drivers: hv: Allow vmbus message synic interrupt injected from Hyper-V

[Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 10:11 PM Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 5:19 AM
> >
> > When Secure AVIC is enabled, VMBus driver should
> > call x2apic Secure AVIC interface to allow Hyper-V
> > to inject VMBus message interrupt.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <tiala@microsoft.com>
> > ---
> > Change since RFC V5:
> >        - Rmove extra line and move hv_enable_coco_interrupt()
> >          just after hv_set_msr() in the hv_synic_disable_regs().
> >
> > Change since RFC V4:
> >         - Change the order to call hv_enable_coco_interrupt()
> >         in the hv_synic_enable/disable_regs().
> >       - Update commit title "Drivers/hv:" to "Drivers: hv:"
> >
> > Change since RFC V3:
> >        - Disable VMBus Message interrupt via hv_enable_
> >                coco_interrupt() in the hv_synic_disable_regs().
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c      | 5 +++++
> >  drivers/hv/hv.c                | 7 ++++++-
> >  drivers/hv/hv_common.c         | 5 +++++
> >  include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 1 +
> >  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> > index 01bc02cc0590..c9808a51fa37 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> > @@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ static void hv_apic_icr_write(u32 low, u32 id)
> >       wrmsrq(HV_X64_MSR_ICR, reg_val);
> >  }
> >
> > +void hv_enable_coco_interrupt(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int vector, bool set)
> > +{
> > +     apic_update_vector(cpu, vector, set);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static u32 hv_apic_read(u32 reg)
> >  {
> >       u32 reg_val, hi;
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > index 308c8f279df8..d68a96de1626 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > @@ -312,10 +312,13 @@ void hv_synic_enable_regs(unsigned int cpu)
> >       shared_sint.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT);
> >
> >       shared_sint.vector = vmbus_interrupt;
> > +
>
> The spurious blank line is still here.
>
> >       shared_sint.masked = false;
> >       shared_sint.auto_eoi = hv_recommend_using_aeoi();
> >       hv_set_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64);
> >
> > +     hv_enable_coco_interrupt(cpu, vmbus_interrupt, true);
> > +
> >       /* Enable the global synic bit */
> >       sctrl.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SCONTROL);
> >       sctrl.enable = 1;
> > @@ -342,7 +345,6 @@ void hv_synic_disable_regs(unsigned int cpu)
> >       union hv_synic_scontrol sctrl;
> >
> >       shared_sint.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT);
> > -
> >       shared_sint.masked = 1;
> >
> >       /* Need to correctly cleanup in the case of SMP!!! */
> > @@ -350,6 +352,9 @@ void hv_synic_disable_regs(unsigned int cpu)
> >       hv_set_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64);
> >
> >       simp.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SIMP);
> > +
> > +     hv_enable_coco_interrupt(cpu, vmbus_interrupt, false);
> > +
>
> This line is still in the wrong place. Maybe you accidentally resent
> the previous version of the patch instead of the version with your
> intended changes?
>
> Michael
Hi Michael:
      I just sent out an update version. Sorry for confusion.
-- 
Thanks
Tianyu Lan