From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:49:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1311694534-5161-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:52554 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753844Ab1GZVuB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:50:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , benh@kernel.crashing.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com Hello, On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > it passes test with my x86 64bits setups. Great, thanks for testing. > looks like tip/master does not include tip/x86/memblock and tip/x86/mm yet. > > So tip/x86/memblock, tip/x86/mm will not get into 3.1? Yeah, I think the whole thing including the last patchset was a bit too late for this merge window. These are basically cleanups and could possibly cause weird boot regressions, so having enough time in -tip before going mainline seems like a good idea to me. Thanks. -- tejun