From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-172.mta0.migadu.com (out-172.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B643A0E81 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783997195; cv=none; b=skVZtrOqjCDrd+fhQbjTqsDnvplMQchvTUvFLCNaCdbqPEFL8E3cI5KzJK1Rusbt/zSZTujx/DwgOyzzOjSnsFyAHJy4Q2/amufgK9AWP2G+cVXnu1TTjg/7Hpo0PMEz+wS/EF84UHVBycOrYfQHkM7/0G9UGOapzESfhI7+bfQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783997195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9bUacWTJi0a97hmDwxtNquaIhVVwoI9zj+xO3eJwnuo=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Message-Id:References:To; b=cQXrrqU/vwMIeS4I6nD2ZBGR2aPzHfxH6NQZ3kOklwHZm8KbS3gJr++toefjJVnNZMvTMUuB5YEfuVjbqpG25JdYgiICUyJ1I4/5XABV8PLynF1Gs4jJwzjLnsfm5+dcbabW0DNFmGAaLXEXP91fOMHZZDxWBoK6viGmS5D4LTM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=mClcqMyN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="mClcqMyN" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1783997189; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EAQHSDx5Pf+w4+v4uxcesiEVqlXwwknrma7QzuTbLYc=; b=mClcqMyNV4sFTQazeEiZNF5uDwQLQhez8hYB4lH6ijsXHxaEdK7XG/mIiCfJdQb7RPf5bd 2fiOxABPjI7E2jAbl7eAiY6MNJnUN6xTLjVE78wHQmn1D6S5R7TOBzUqy6H5uXrahWl0qB eNc/y8IWLJ9AhDmXEIBwS+W2nimHfKQ= Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.600.51.1.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] mm: add a set_page_section_from_pfn() helper X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Muchun Song In-Reply-To: <20260709112520.24857-4-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:45:52 +0800 Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, apopple@nvidia.com, arnd@arndb.de, balbirs@nvidia.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, david@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <20260709112520.24857-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> <20260709112520.24857-4-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> To: Li Zhe X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT > On Jul 9, 2026, at 19:25, Li Zhe wrote: > > Callers that want to update section bits from a PFN currently need to > open-code: > > set_page_section(page, pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)); > > and guard that sequence with #ifdef SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS. > > Add set_page_section_from_pfn() to wrap that update in one place. When > section bits are stored in page flags, the helper derives the section > number from the PFN and updates the page flags. Otherwise keep it as a > no-op so callers can use one helper without open-coding > SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS. > > Convert set_page_links() to use the new helper so later ZONE_DEVICE > fast-path patches can also update section bits without open-coding > SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS at each callsite. > > This keeps the PFN-to-section translation local to the configurations > that actually store section bits in struct page flags, and avoids > exposing that detail to generic callers. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhe > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) Acked-by: Muchun Song