From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([69.30.125.51]:35046 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161441AbWASVs2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:48:28 -0500 Received: from [10.107.17.130] by x35.dev.mdolabs.com with [XMail 1.23 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:48:25 -0800 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:48:21 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: new syscalls In-Reply-To: <20060118172802.5155048f.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20060118133629.1cda96fd.akpm@osdl.org> <20060118172802.5155048f.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, janak@us.ibm.com, Ulrich Drepper , dwmw2@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, christoph@lameter.com List-ID: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: >> >> How sophisticated this has to be? > > umm > > - test basic functionality > > - test things which should fail: syscall arguments out-of-bounds, > negative syscall args, etc. invalid fd. valid fd but for the wrong type > of file. > > - if you can, something which will test the 32bit->64bit->32bit > conversions which 32-bit userspace on 64-bit kernel needs to do. Somehow, I knew I didn't have to ask :) - Davide