From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([69.30.125.51]:41702 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161422AbWATAe7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:34:59 -0500 Received: from [10.107.17.130] by x35.dev.mdolabs.com with [XMail 1.23 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:34:52 -0800 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:34:52 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: new syscalls In-Reply-To: <43D02D85.90100@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20060118133629.1cda96fd.akpm@osdl.org> <20060118172802.5155048f.akpm@osdl.org> <43D02D85.90100@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Andrew Morton , tony.luck@intel.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, janak@us.ibm.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, christoph@lameter.com List-ID: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: >> There is a problem with the test we have inside the kernel about the >> size of sigset_t, from the kernel (8 bytes on i386) and the glibc one >> (128 bytes): > > Not really a problem. We always pass down _NSIG/8 as the size. Ok, I use _NSIG/8 inside the test software now. - Davide