From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:1605 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752300AbXFYOG2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:06:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:06:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel Subject: Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up In-Reply-To: <467FC985.7080703@anagramm.de> Message-ID: References: <20070620230854.246399397@goop.org> <20070620230902.387008536@goop.org> <1182762166.12109.19.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <467FC985.7080703@anagramm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Clemens Koller Cc: David Woodhouse , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "Eric W. Biederman" , lkml , Andrew Morton , Linux Arch List-ID: Hi, On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Clemens Koller wrote: > > glibc provides its own version, so it doesn't has to be exported at all. > > AFAIK the glibc folks want to rely more on the linux kernel headers > in the future and not provide more or less redundant headers anymore... In this case it's more an ABI header, it doesn't export any kernel interfaces. bye, Roman