From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for review] [11/48] x86_64: During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:14:50 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707191614180.7377@anakin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070719140411.GD16279@infradead.org>
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:48:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > During a VM oom condition, kill all threads in the process group.
> >
> > We have had complaints where a threaded application is left in a bad state
> > after one of it's threads is killed when we hit a VM: out_of_memory condition.
> >
> > Killing just one of the process threads can leave the application in a bad
> > state, whereas killing the entire process group would allow for the
> > application to restart, or otherwise handled, and makes it very obvious that
> > something has gone wrong.
> >
> > This change allows the entire process group to be taken down, rather than just
> > the one thread.
>
> Shouldn't we have one patc hthat does this for every architecture instead
> of going through arch maintainers and probably losing half of them?
Yes, please ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
return -EMAINTAINER_TOO_BUSY
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070719348.540885000@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20070719134840.47B5114E6E@wotan.suse.de>
2007-07-19 14:04 ` [PATCH for review] [11/48] x86_64: During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-19 14:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2007-07-19 15:03 ` Will Schmidt
2007-07-23 18:09 ` [PATCH respin, was PATCH for review] " Will Schmidt
2007-07-23 21:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-24 14:28 ` Will Schmidt
2007-07-24 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-31 9:31 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 14:55 ` Will Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0707191614180.7377@anakin \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).