linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Jules Maselbas" <jmaselbas@kalray.eu>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Andrea Parri" <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
	"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Jade Alglave" <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
	"Luc Maranget" <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Akira Yokosawa" <akiyks@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Lustig" <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Jonas Oberhauser" <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>,
	"Hernan Ponce de Leon" <hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>,
	"Paul Heidekrüger" <paul.heidekrueger@in.tum.de>,
	"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
	"Wedson Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/atomic: atomic: Use arch_atomic_{read,set} in generic atomic ops
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:09:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9RLpYGmzW1KPksE@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9Pg+aNM9f48SY5Z@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 03:34:33PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I also noticed that GCC has some builtin/extension to do such things,
> > __atomic_OP_fetch and __atomic_fetch_OP, but I do not know if this
> > can be used in the kernel.
> 
> On a per-architecture basis only, the C/C++ memory model does not match
> the Linux Kernel memory model so using the compiler to generate the
> atomic ops is somewhat tricky and needs architecture audits.

Hijack this thread a little bit, but while we are at it, do you think it
makes sense that we have a config option that allows archs to
implement LKMM atomics via C11 (volatile) atomics? I know there are gaps
between two memory models, but the option is only for fallback/generic
implementation so we can put extra barriers/orderings to make things
guaranteed to work.

It'll be a code version of this document:

	https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p0124r7.html

(although I realise there may be a few mistakes in that doc since I
wasn't familiar with C11 memory model when I wrote part of the doc, but
these can be fixed)

Another reason I ask is that since Rust is coming, we need to provide
our LKMM atomics in Rust so that C code and Rust code can talk via same
atomic variables, since both sides need to use the same memory model.
My choices are:

1.	Using FFI to call Linux atomic APIs: not inline therefore not
	efficient.

2.	Implementing Rust LKMM atomics in asm: much more work although
	I'm OK if we have to do it.

3.	Implementing Rust LKMM atomics with standard atomics (i.e. C/C++
	atomics):

	*	Requires Rust has "volatile" atomics, which is WIP but
		looks promising
	
	*	Less efficient compared to choice #2 but more efficient
		compared to choice #1

Ideally, choice #2 is the best option for all architectures, however, if
we have the generic implementation based on choice #3, for some archs it
may be good enough.

Thoughts?

[Cc LKMM and Rust people]

Regards,
Boqun

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-27 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-26 17:33 [PATCH] locking/atomic: atomic: Use arch_atomic_{read,set} in generic atomic ops Jules Maselbas
2023-01-27 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 13:49   ` Jules Maselbas
2023-01-27 14:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 22:09       ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2023-01-30 12:23         ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-30 18:38           ` Boqun Feng
2023-01-31 15:08             ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-31 22:03               ` Boqun Feng
2023-02-01 10:51                 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-30 18:15       ` Jules Maselbas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9RLpYGmzW1KPksE@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=jmaselbas@kalray.eu \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul.heidekrueger@in.tum.de \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).