From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:37:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTl8gauEst2NGrw6@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR11MB575134C301E7E17E72281CFAB8DEA@DM8PR11MB5751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 06:50:05AM +0000, Wang, Xiao W wrote:
> Hi Charlie,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-riscv <linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On Behalf Of
> > Charlie Jenkins
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 2:45 AM
> > To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>; Palmer Dabbelt
> > <palmer@dabbelt.com>; Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>; Samuel Holland
> > <samuel.holland@sifive.com>; David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>;
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > arch@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>; Albert Ou
> > <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header
> >
> > Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
> > instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
> > register to avoid some overflow checking.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 79
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..dc0dd89f2a13
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * IP checksum routines
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> > +#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/in6.h>
> > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +
> > +#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
> > +
> > +#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers
> > will
> > + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> > + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal
> > to 5.
> > + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.
>
> Not sure if the assumption is always true. It looks the implementation in "lib/checksum.c" doesn't take this assumption.
> The ip header can comes after a 14-Byte ether header, which may start from a word-aligned or DMA friendly address.
While lib/checksum.c does not make this assumption, other architectures
(x86, ARM, powerpc, mips, arc) do make this assumption. Architectures
seem to only align the header on a word boundary in do_csum. I worry
that the benefit of aligning iph in this "fast" csum function would
disproportionately impact hardware that has fast misaligned accesses.
- Charlie
>
> > + */
> > +static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long csum = 0;
> > + int pos = 0;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> > + csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> > + } while (++pos < ihl);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
> > + * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> > + unsigned long fold_temp;
> > +
> > + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
> > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> > + :
> > + :
> > + :
> > + : no_zbb);
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> > + asm(".option push \n\
> > + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> > + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + rori %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> > + sub %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + .option pop"
> > + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> > + } else {
> > + asm(".option push \n\
> > + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> > + rori %[fold_temp], %[csum], 32 \n\
> > + add %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + srli %[csum], %[csum], 32 \n\
> > + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + roriw %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> > + subw %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + .option pop"
> > + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> > + }
> > + return csum >> 16;
> > + }
> > +no_zbb:
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
> > + csum += (csum >> 32) | (csum << 32);
>
> Just like patch 3/4 does, we can call ror64(csum, 32).
>
> BRs,
> Xiao
>
> > + csum >>= 32;
> > +#endif
> > + return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif // __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> >
> > --
> > 2.42.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 18:44 [PATCH v7 0/4] riscv: Add fine-tuned checksum functions Charlie Jenkins
2023-09-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] asm-generic: Improve csum_fold Charlie Jenkins
2023-09-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header Charlie Jenkins
2023-10-12 14:54 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-25 6:50 ` Wang, Xiao W
2023-10-25 20:37 ` Charlie Jenkins [this message]
2023-10-25 20:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-10-25 21:11 ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-10-25 21:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-10-25 21:20 ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-09-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] riscv: Add checksum library Charlie Jenkins
2023-10-12 14:51 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-25 7:29 ` Wang, Xiao W
2023-09-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] riscv: Test checksum functions Charlie Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTl8gauEst2NGrw6@ghost \
--to=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).