linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com,
	charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com,
	cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 11/28] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:31:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_aExLYaCm63TObz@debug.ba.rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f9c48a6-1256-4e52-a26a-7f80f3b7c05a@ghiti.fr>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:51:45PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
>On 14/03/2025 22:39, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>Userspace specifies CLONE_VM to share address space and spawn new thread.
>>`clone` allow userspace to specify a new stack for new thread. However
>>there is no way to specify new shadow stack base address without changing
>>API. This patch allocates a new shadow stack whenever CLONE_VM is given.
>>
>>In case of CLONE_VFORK, parent is suspended until child finishes and thus
>>can child use parent shadow stack. In case of !CLONE_VM, COW kicks in
>>because entire address space is copied from parent to child.
>>
>>`clone3` is extensible and can provide mechanisms using which shadow stack
>>as an input parameter can be provided. This is not settled yet and being
>>extensively discussed on mailing list. Once that's settled, this commit
>>will adapt to that.
>
>
>What's the status of this discussion? Can you provide a Link to it?

It's ongoing right now at v15
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250408-clone3-shadow-stack-v15-0-3fa245c6e3be@kernel.org/

>
>
>>
>>Reviewed-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
>>---
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h |   7 ++
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h     |  25 ++++++++
>>  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c          |   9 +++
>>  arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c          | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>>index 8c4bc49a3a0f..dbf27a78df6c 100644
>>--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>>+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>>@@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ static inline unsigned long mm_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>+#define deactivate_mm deactivate_mm
>>+static inline void deactivate_mm(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>+				 struct mm_struct *mm)
>>+{
>>+	shstk_release(tsk);
>>+}
>>+
>>  #include <asm-generic/mmu_context.h>
>>  #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
>>diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
>>index 5f2027c51917..82d28ac98d76 100644
>>--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
>>+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
>>@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
>>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>+struct task_struct;
>>+struct kernel_clone_args;
>>+
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
>>  struct cfi_status {
>>  	unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */
>>@@ -17,6 +20,28 @@ struct cfi_status {
>>  	unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */
>>  };
>>+unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>+				       const struct kernel_clone_args *args);
>>+void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk);
>>+void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size);
>>+unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size);
>>+void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr);
>>+bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task);
>>+
>>+#else
>>+
>>+#define shstk_alloc_thread_stack(tsk, args) 0
>>+
>>+#define shstk_release(tsk)
>>+
>>+#define get_shstk_base(task, size) 0UL
>>+
>>+#define set_shstk_base(task, shstk_addr, size)
>>+
>>+#define set_active_shstk(task, shstk_addr)
>>+
>>+#define is_shstk_enabled(task) false
>>+
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */
>>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
>>index 7c244de77180..99acb6342a37 100644
>>--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
>>+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
>>@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/vector.h>
>>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>>  #include <asm/exec.h>
>>+#include <asm/usercfi.h>
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK)
>>  #include <linux/stackprotector.h>
>>@@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
>>  	unsigned long clone_flags = args->flags;
>>  	unsigned long usp = args->stack;
>>  	unsigned long tls = args->tls;
>>+	unsigned long ssp = 0;
>>  	struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p);
>>  	/* Ensure all threads in this mm have the same pointer masking mode. */
>>@@ -229,11 +231,18 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
>>  		p->thread.s[0] = (unsigned long)args->fn;
>>  		p->thread.s[1] = (unsigned long)args->fn_arg;
>>  	} else {
>>+		/* allocate new shadow stack if needed. In case of CLONE_VM we have to */
>>+		ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, args);
>>+		if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ssp))
>>+			return PTR_ERR((void *)ssp);
>>+
>>  		*childregs = *(current_pt_regs());
>>  		/* Turn off status.VS */
>>  		riscv_v_vstate_off(childregs);
>>  		if (usp) /* User fork */
>>  			childregs->sp = usp;
>>+		/* if needed, set new ssp */
>>+		ssp ? set_active_shstk(p, ssp) : 0;
>
>
>The use of the ternary here is weird, can you change that to a if 
>statement?
>
>
>>  		if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
>>  			childregs->tp = tls;
>>  		childregs->a0 = 0; /* Return value of fork() */
>>diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
>>index 24022809a7b5..73cf87dab186 100644
>>--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
>>+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
>>@@ -19,6 +19,41 @@
>>  #define SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE sizeof(void *)
>>+bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
>>+{
>>+	return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false;
>>+}
>>+
>>+void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size)
>>+{
>>+	task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base = shstk_addr;
>>+	task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_size = size;
>>+}
>>+
>>+unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size)
>>+{
>>+	if (size)
>>+		*size = task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_size;
>>+	return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base;
>>+}
>>+
>>+void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr)
>>+{
>>+	task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr;
>>+}
>>+
>>+/*
>>+ * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as
>>+ * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back
>>+ */
>>+static unsigned long calc_shstk_size(unsigned long size)
>>+{
>>+	if (size)
>>+		return PAGE_ALIGN(size);
>>+
>>+	return PAGE_ALIGN(min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G));
>>+}
>>+
>>  /*
>>   * Writes on shadow stack can either be `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. `sspush` can happen
>>   * implicitly on current shadow stack pointed to by CSR_SSP. `ssamoswap` takes pointer to
>>@@ -142,3 +177,88 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsi
>>  	return allocate_shadow_stack(addr, aligned_size, size, set_tok);
>>  }
>>+
>>+/*
>>+ * This gets called during clone/clone3/fork. And is needed to allocate a shadow stack for
>>+ * cases where CLONE_VM is specified and thus a different stack is specified by user. We
>>+ * thus need a separate shadow stack too. How does separate shadow stack is specified by
>>+ * user is still being debated. Once that's settled, remove this part of the comment.
>>+ * This function simply returns 0 if shadow stack are not supported or if separate shadow
>>+ * stack allocation is not needed (like in case of !CLONE_VM)
>>+ */
>>+unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>+				       const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
>>+{
>>+	unsigned long addr, size;
>>+
>>+	/* If shadow stack is not supported, return 0 */
>>+	if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack())
>>+		return 0;
>>+
>>+	/*
>>+	 * If shadow stack is not enabled on the new thread, skip any
>>+	 * switch to a new shadow stack.
>>+	 */
>>+	if (!is_shstk_enabled(tsk))
>>+		return 0;
>>+
>>+	/*
>>+	 * For CLONE_VFORK the child will share the parents shadow stack.
>>+	 * Set base = 0 and size = 0, this is special means to track this state
>>+	 * so the freeing logic run for child knows to leave it alone.
>>+	 */
>>+	if (args->flags & CLONE_VFORK) {
>>+		set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0);
>>+		return 0;
>>+	}
>>+
>>+	/*
>>+	 * For !CLONE_VM the child will use a copy of the parents shadow
>>+	 * stack.
>>+	 */
>>+	if (!(args->flags & CLONE_VM))
>>+		return 0;
>>+
>>+	/*
>>+	 * reaching here means, CLONE_VM was specified and thus a separate shadow
>>+	 * stack is needed for new cloned thread. Note: below allocation is happening
>>+	 * using current mm.
>>+	 */
>>+	size = calc_shstk_size(args->stack_size);
>>+	addr = allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false);
>>+	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
>>+		return addr;
>>+
>>+	set_shstk_base(tsk, addr, size);
>>+
>>+	return addr + size;
>>+}
>>+
>>+void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>+{
>>+	unsigned long base = 0, size = 0;
>>+	/* If shadow stack is not supported or not enabled, nothing to release */
>>+	if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || !is_shstk_enabled(tsk))
>>+		return;
>>+
>>+	/*
>>+	 * When fork() with CLONE_VM fails, the child (tsk) already has a
>>+	 * shadow stack allocated, and exit_thread() calls this function to
>>+	 * free it.  In this case the parent (current) and the child share
>>+	 * the same mm struct. Move forward only when they're same.
>>+	 */
>>+	if (!tsk->mm || tsk->mm != current->mm)
>>+		return;
>>+
>>+	/*
>>+	 * We know shadow stack is enabled but if base is NULL, then
>>+	 * this task is not managing its own shadow stack (CLONE_VFORK). So
>>+	 * skip freeing it.
>>+	 */
>>+	base = get_shstk_base(tsk, &size);
>>+	if (!base)
>>+		return;
>>+
>>+	vm_munmap(base, size);
>>+	set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0);
>>+}
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14 21:39 [PATCH v12 00/28] riscv control-flow integrity for usermode Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 01/28] mm: VM_SHADOW_STACK definition for riscv Deepak Gupta
2025-04-07 15:45   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 02/28] dt-bindings: riscv: zicfilp and zicfiss in dt-bindings (extensions.yaml) Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 03/28] riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration Deepak Gupta
2025-04-07 15:48   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-04-09 14:43     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 04/28] riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp extension csr and bit definitions Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 05/28] riscv: usercfi state for task and save/restore of CSR_SSP on trap entry/exit Deepak Gupta
2025-04-08  8:05   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-04-10 11:04   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24  0:00     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-24 11:52       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24 17:56         ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-25 11:27           ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24  0:23     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-24 12:16       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24 18:03         ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-25 11:32           ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 06/28] riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE Deepak Gupta
2025-04-08 10:39   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-04-10 10:03   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24  0:45     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-24 12:23       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24 12:43         ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 07/28] riscv mm: manufacture shadow stack pte Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 08/28] riscv mmu: teach pte_mkwrite to manufacture shadow stack PTEs Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 09/28] riscv mmu: write protect and shadow stack Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 10/28] riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall Deepak Gupta
2025-04-07  4:50   ` Zong Li
2025-04-09 14:19     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-10  9:56   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24  3:16     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-24 12:51       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 11/28] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone Deepak Gupta
2025-04-08 10:51   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-04-09 14:31     ` Deepak Gupta [this message]
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 12/28] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls Deepak Gupta
2025-03-17  1:29   ` Zong Li
2025-04-10  9:45   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24  4:44     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-24 13:36       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-24 18:16         ` Deepak Gupta
2025-04-25 11:42           ` Radim Krčmář
2025-04-25 16:39             ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 13/28] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking Deepak Gupta
2025-03-17  1:29   ` Zong Li
2025-04-09  8:03   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-04-09 14:26     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 14/28] riscv: Implements arch agnostic indirect branch tracking prctls Deepak Gupta
2025-03-17  1:29   ` Zong Li
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 15/28] riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 16/28] riscv: signal: abstract header saving for setup_sigcontext Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 17/28] riscv/signal: save and restore of shadow stack for signal Deepak Gupta
2025-04-10  8:49   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 18/28] riscv/kernel: update __show_regs to print shadow stack register Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 19/28] riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files Deepak Gupta
2025-03-20 22:24   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-20 23:09     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-21  7:22       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 20/28] riscv/hwprobe: zicfilp / zicfiss enumeration in hwprobe Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 21/28] riscv: Add Firmware Feature SBI extensions definitions Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 22/28] riscv: enable kernel access to shadow stack memory via FWFT sbi call Deepak Gupta
2025-03-20 22:10   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-20 22:42     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-21  7:35       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 23/28] riscv: kernel command line option to opt out of user cfi Deepak Gupta
2025-03-20 21:35   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-20 22:31     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-21  7:31       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 24/28] arch/riscv: compile vdso with landing pad Deepak Gupta
2025-04-08 12:45   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-04-09 14:28     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 25/28] riscv: create a config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support Deepak Gupta
2025-03-20 21:25   ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-20 22:29     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-21  7:51       ` Radim Krčmář
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 26/28] riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking Deepak Gupta
2025-04-08  8:36   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 27/28] riscv: Documentation for shadow stack on riscv Deepak Gupta
2025-04-08  8:48   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-04-10  5:24     ` Deepak Gupta
2025-03-14 21:39 ` [PATCH v12 28/28] kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi Deepak Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_aExLYaCm63TObz@debug.ba.rivosinc.com \
    --to=debug@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=andybnac@gmail.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jim.shu@sifive.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).