From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sandipan Das Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/24] selftests, powerpc, x86: Memory Protection Keys Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:55:52 +0530 Message-ID: References: <5887a858-b669-752e-b65e-ed7d7ded34aa@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:14206 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726874AbgCBK0F (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:26:05 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 022APDxv006611 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:26:04 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yfnbejvu0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:26:04 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:26:01 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5887a858-b669-752e-b65e-ed7d7ded34aa@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Dave Hansen , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fweimer@redhat.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, msuchanek@suse.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org Hi Shuah, On 31/01/20 3:21 am, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/29/20 10:36 PM, Sandipan Das wrote: >> v18: >> (1) Fixed issues with x86 multilib builds based on >> feedback from Dave. >> (2) Moved patch 2 to the end of the series. > > These (finally) build and run successfully for me on an x86 system with > protection keys. Feel free to add my Tested-by, and Acked-by. > > FWIW, I don't think look perfect, but my standards are lower for > selftests/ than normal kernel code. :) > Any updates on considering this for merging? - Sandipan