From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Logan Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: provide ioread64 and iowrite64 implementations Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:17:42 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20170624115707.30095-1-horia.geanta@nxp.com> <20170624151308.6348-1-rth@twiddle.net> <787b4be1-ce9e-6838-27b6-0cd9f8d7805f@twiddle.net> <721fd59b-b807-86bf-a39c-bab0b33c57c0@deltatee.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-alpha-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Henderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 24/06/17 10:14 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > So you would prefer a function containing BUG? Don't be so obtuse. Of course not. > Because I have to have *something* to put into the machvec function > pointer. Well I can't say I understand the point of the machvec code, but if you're saying it's impossible to have the Jensen sub-arch not supply a 64bit io functions then, fine, leave it as is. Logan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ale.deltatee.com ([207.54.116.67]:60985 "EHLO ale.deltatee.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754997AbdFXRRv (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 13:17:51 -0400 References: <20170624115707.30095-1-horia.geanta@nxp.com> <20170624151308.6348-1-rth@twiddle.net> <787b4be1-ce9e-6838-27b6-0cd9f8d7805f@twiddle.net> <721fd59b-b807-86bf-a39c-bab0b33c57c0@deltatee.com> From: Logan Gunthorpe Message-ID: Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:17:42 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: provide ioread64 and iowrite64 implementations Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Richard Henderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner Message-ID: <20170624171742.O_XCKXBlCo5caI4um89mprY4u37ZLEmylK6EjtMAUPM@z> On 24/06/17 10:14 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > So you would prefer a function containing BUG? Don't be so obtuse. Of course not. > Because I have to have *something* to put into the machvec function > pointer. Well I can't say I understand the point of the machvec code, but if you're saying it's impossible to have the Jensen sub-arch not supply a 64bit io functions then, fine, leave it as is. Logan