From: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Simon Schuster <schuster.simon+binutils@siemens-energy.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel/fork.c:3088:2: warning: clone3() entry point is missing, please fix
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:31:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGIvWBeEQuy7QgfK@rli9-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ef5bc91-f56d-4c76-b12e-2797999cba72@app.fastmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 08:14:16AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, at 21:59, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> >
> > date: 12 months ago
> > config: hexagon-randconfig-2002-20250626
> > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250628/202506282120.6vRwodm3-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > commit: 505d66d1abfb90853e24ab6cbdf83b611473d6fc clone3: drop __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE3 macro
> >> kernel/fork.c:3088:2: warning: clone3() entry point is missing, please fix [-W#warnings]
>
> My patch only moved the warning about the four broken architectures
> (hexagon, sparc, sh, nios2) that have never implemented the clone3
> syscall from commit 7f192e3cd316 ("fork: add clone3"), over six years
> ago.
Sorry for the false positive, I will configure the bot to avoid sending
this again.
>
> I usually try to fix warnings when I get them, but the entire point
> why these still exist is that they require someone to add the
> syscall with the correct calling conventions for the respective
> architecture and make sure this actually works correctly.
>
> I don't think any of those architecture maintainers are paying
> attention to the build warnings or the lkp reports, and they are
> clearly not trying to fix them any more, so maybe it's better to
> just stop testing them in lkp.
Thanks for the comments, we will consider to adjust the priority for
the related archs. Also welcome more inputs for how to test and report
out issues of these archs.
>
> Arnd
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <202506282120.6vRwodm3-lkp@intel.com>
2025-06-30 6:14 ` kernel/fork.c:3088:2: warning: clone3() entry point is missing, please fix Arnd Bergmann
2025-06-30 6:30 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-06-30 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-06-30 10:45 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-06-30 12:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-06-30 15:24 ` Andreas Larsson
2025-07-01 8:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-30 6:31 ` Philip Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGIvWBeEQuy7QgfK@rli9-mobl \
--to=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=schuster.simon+binutils@siemens-energy.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox