From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 15:39:07 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1211852026.3286.36.camel@pasglop> <20080526.184047.88207142.davem@davemloft.net> <1211854540.3286.42.camel@pasglop> <20080526.192812.184590464.davem@davemloft.net> <20080526204233.75b71bb8@infradead.org> <1211872130.3286.64.camel@pasglop> <1211922696.3286.82.camel@pasglop> <1211926410.3286.95.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:9725 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756969AbYE0WjJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 18:39:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1211926410.3286.95.camel@pasglop> (Benjamin Herrenschmidt's message of "Wed, 28 May 2008 08:13:30 +1000") Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpiepho@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, scottwood@freescale.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, David Miller , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk > > Cool... I assume you do this for mutex_unlock() etc? > That's a good point... I don't think we do. Maybe we should. I think it's needed -- take a look at 76d7cc03, which came from a real bug seen on Altix boxes.