From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
metcalf@alum.mit.edu, Henrik Grindal Bakken <hgb@ifi.uio.no>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Helmut Grohne <helmutg@debian.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 16:00:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803071557070.28840@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3itR8i2ayG7e4ku7kz+CQU7qHhptdmtmgTz+CzFGmCiw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Do you have any updates on this? A related question has come up
> for the kernel, as are in the process of removing a number of architectures,
> https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/748074/119aaf0d62b3e6c1/ or
> see https://lwn.net/Articles/748074/ for a nice summary.
No-one has posted glibc test results for 2.27 or 2.26, despite the prior
claims of interest in keeping the glibc port. If the kernel port is
removed, my assumption is that we should remove the glibc port at that
point (not keep it around for possible use with older kernels).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1a57be83-3349-5450-ee4f-d2a33569a728@mellanox.com>
[not found] ` <d6c8e425-a6b6-6594-05e3-965536f06da3@physik.fu-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <abce89d0-6798-069a-1a54-06e664665b78@mellanox.com>
[not found] ` <dc3c52ce-f082-0da0-7828-0d4e6751e2a5@physik.fu-berlin.de>
2018-03-07 15:39 ` RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-07 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-07 16:00 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2018-03-07 16:00 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-07 16:08 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-07 16:08 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-07 18:14 ` Helmut Grohne
2018-03-07 18:14 ` Helmut Grohne
2018-03-08 15:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-08 15:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-08 16:06 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-08 16:06 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-08 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-08 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-09 16:31 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-09 16:31 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-09 16:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-09 16:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-09 16:53 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-09 16:53 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-08 17:14 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-08 17:14 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-08 23:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-08 23:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1803071557070.28840@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=helmutg@debian.org \
--cc=hgb@ifi.uio.no \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=metcalf@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox