From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] mremap/mmap mess
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:44:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912051242460.3649@localhost.localdomain>
References: <E1NGzzu-0008RH-T2@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:53599 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754191AbZLEUor (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:44:47 -0500
In-Reply-To: <E1NGzzu-0008RH-T2@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> [NOTE: the patch series below is not for merge until ACKed by arch maintainers]

Side note - I'd like to get this in early rather than late.

So if some arch maintainer is tardy, I'd rather do the series quickly even 
without an ack. I'd hate to apply this series just days before the merge 
window closes and then have to fix things up. In contrast, applying it 
early (even if that is then followed by "and then have to fix things up") 
is much preferable.

		Linus