From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 00/47] Sparse irq rework Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:12:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20100930221351.682772535@linutronix.de> <20101003112312.GB9844@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101003112920.GB32736@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4CACFC23.4080504@kernel.org> <4CAD082B.40908@kernel.org> <4CAD1154.3080403@kernel.org> <4CAD4EC3.5060809@kernel.org> <4CAFEEFA.1070000@kernel.org> <4CB013CB.1040904@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:57319 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753931Ab0JIMNd (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2010 08:13:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CB013CB.1040904@kernel.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Grant Likely , Russell King - ARM Linux , LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mundt , David Woodhouse , Jesse Barnes , "Eric W. Biederman" On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 10/08/2010 11:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> [ 59.449366] IP: [] acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry+0x85/0xb1 > > > > I can hardly see how this is related to the irq work. > > > >> [ 71.076886] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.36-rc7-tip-yh-01944-ge8a4c5f-dirty #171 /Sun Fire x4800 > >> [ 71.096947] RIP: 0010:[] [] strcmp+0x4/0x21 > > > > Ditto. > > don't know. > > but without merging your branch, those problems don't come out. > > only thing i can think about that you real free irq code could > stress or expose other subsystem's bug etc. The first crash is in early boot and that code just fiddles with acpi internal stuff. Is that fully reproducible ? If yes, any chance you can bisect it ? Thanks, tglx