RE: [PATCHv1 000/211] unicore32 architecture support

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-arch-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Gleixner
> > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:50 PM
> > To: Tejun Heo
> > Cc: Guan Xuetao; Arnd Bergmann; linux-arch@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 000/211] unicore32 architecture support

Please fix your mail client to do proper citations. A single line 

On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

or whatever your preferred cite line is, is sufficient. We all have
the mail header already.
 
> > It's ok to have several patches ordered by topics
> > 
> >   - generic header stuff
> >   - processor and system headers
> >   - low level entry and setup code
> >   - process/thread related code
> >   - mm related code
> >   - timers
> >   - interrupts
> >   - ptrace
> >   - signals
> >   - fault handling
> >   - misc
> >   - build system, main makefile, Kconfig
> > 
> > That makes it actually feasible to review.
> Thanks,
> I will rearrange my patches.

And please mail them to yourself before you post them and make sure
they apply and resemble exaclty what you wanted to send. I just
noticed, that your mailer line-wrapped the patches:

+       /*
+        * actually the registers should be pushed and pop'd conditionally,
but
+        * after bl the flags are certainly clobbered
+        */

Thanks,

	tglx