From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] spinlock: allow inlined spinlocks Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20090814125801.881618121@de.ibm.com> <20090814125857.181021997@de.ibm.com> <20090816175750.GA5808@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20090816180631.GA23448@elte.hu> <20090816202431.GA27764@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43363 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755994AbZHPVIg (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:08:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090816202431.GA27764@elte.hu> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Heiko Carstens , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Arnd Bergmann , Horst Hartmann , Christian Ehrhardt , Nick Piggin On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > We do that already for that reason: Ahh, we do. I was mislead by the fact that we still generate the out-of-line ones, even though we don't use them. Which is fine, of course. It doesn't do the irqrestore versions, but that's probably not a big deal. Linus