From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 00/18] SMP: Boot and CPU hotplug refactoring - Part 1 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:19:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20120420122120.097464672@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:45268 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754372Ab2DTOTL (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:19:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: richard -rw- weinberger Cc: LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Rusty Russell , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > This converts all architectures except m32r, mn10300, tile and UM to > > the new core facility. These architecture are calling fork_idle() in > > the very early boot code in smp_prepare_cpus() for unknown reasons. > > I haven't analyzed yet, whether this is on purpose or can be moved > > over to the generic facility. It'd be nice if the responsible maintainers > > could look into that as well. > > SMP is marked as broken on UM, so I don't have any objections. :-) Great. So we can break it some more and let the poor sod who tries to fix UM SMP deal with it :) Thanks, tglx