From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.215.181 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792637867; b=upLAHMIZWM3JOGzFVLCWiFgAe8Lc2N7w0TaPAFT0CV91jqI4ORNr8PbJRBxHFsSN3O/H djyh7/CK7+tCFuLxFoHun0eoRVs1JE9SE9wEPlRCgY6ixiJMk6yjkEunrum01PqsZPvUx S+02iQIZeb8fIIBi99YiE6qnJiPOcN/BqRXuAAVhkPTRnazvoZKA8Fqf8zoRXasWt0qLL 75MfWivYznbC/PPuvubZGvPKYAmstRipa8mHUT227LcmRPRYqWYPApTK7JLkqT7aZDsiH a5txRKrP38DASGs+6Zrt74HVZ7Yy/Uf8LwHm6VYG3YS12LDGRqHrvFfswJ5IU2Fmo+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792637867; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding: In-Reply-To; bh=9EhJunI31x30V5twb29p5JvXR/ZnOh8avGc16eTeBG0=; b=C2aFqiYzKlhN2Z8ugX3l93K+rQDEt6EiLx6HPf2LoJGVUuZ3Deq6TVraWrq36aCBTB+r FgNzYrHWKpDCLeekcYrYauoS0Zvt6HnVok8udHeFNsKhq9rwVvcIgrAkx/SXVad73KSfS gvsOYCaAcYwMGSD20+yybkejJecaLtT/nP60zIbTeN5EnwMxMQbPD5LEbzFfcxdkkn1mH XREMSrzz/Agke270oXuNO6oQc3gZO535568GAYlx2yHGsFg6v8VQntFUpF0/1q1Y8jwsk k9f///uKsFB4OOsy06HHd2VeFTYC3oljvdTBIUj94QH+F/E8NTBo/DHETnteUbC1BGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=dRoWI2O9; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.215.181 Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com (mail-pg1-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335C4606A31D for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 02:57:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 335C4606A31D Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=dRoWI2O9 Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-cc4b1f7e8f4so534383a12.1 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1792637866; x=1793242666; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=9EhJunI31x30V5twb29p5JvXR/ZnOh8avGc16eTeBG0=; b=dRoWI2O9b4O92k+WOpxwi565DGBEPYlPq0ghfq07r2y3WRvZEDPJ7i0ROgbY6wUSuS AdNT2jZT04waQarxGzpsFOkuGkcLz6ztwEZzLkyCgXet2o61a5dXghq9VTZ92NNNcMrf /+LGCpmWuIP1Aagyq4YfMSLq+WSt92yoZPw+QaI762w393JWkg6u8G3V17ksbFYBBVzI gHiGvVlcABlRMpDhSMkjjrVx/XmdpP/fklOi0VmZNnNnWKpmuvwaR2vQUOrwKNF2oWcT QYXdnfSlN1Fdfqf3CrBxt7gsbSBeCL3AcwfNBYU/Go70bECwqrn8/zbZOHnb2Tq4F2CH jQzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792637866; x=1793242666; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=9EhJunI31x30V5twb29p5JvXR/ZnOh8avGc16eTeBG0=; b=ZdqoUuHDBoZGjtjpneV6xIatOUJz5RX2UGuLir4V+3bLkwZIR8U34Tgr61USfDKgNw tWHeaYgdceSWdJ1WoRmYNHF/t+QDgdjlqbjuhTa7LOXOb4OQfjyiccoERMmExZZSZfWK SgHlxQsU/mxVU4IdN5AFcjJlF8kDJOFK8Gs2tGoVvOmV4KMr7FR2+Vk6Af82MA8UFNf4 j3xC4njy4oFBk+7ZtW01KJypxNJx3zmth4/UmAeoBJN1FS8XrFY/HzVTXPcjm6IC+TWR fJ0W0ECgreJAR2Pjys6ww6IIdJhxP43pps8Y1XPXWu6RyT13ytMo/cCsjpjVE5D8p6f7 79jQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxBYv7VfI/UpX9hhimIjce5aeA7FTLZp9dHvnsO/+iL93u2buGxDqLqiQyy+Pos8QhsWd8cqz/+9GW+@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYLEbpCMIHPa7wV6OWpzA2UJiZgGT7xc7AlknhCQvosPGaP4GGsz MNE62zzCYrGBbkHG+V4Veh4eSl/h67Fo5fLHxg4MPuAuaqlrAIEYJIOmo7EhIjpuMQ== X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0I0aCOB2QAH9bkZYz/+9Sv9ezykU0N6WB49x/X6d4zdiAkDrbqUQP6TpWxXKe upqqmLBkTx8JkyR8KnFYZTpVFRKO2z93JcVuNBMIg5o6EK8EgH4u9v30YF5P7t57WulKCH6+Vrr KBR6cJP9DhMzCK3z3/cvmtNYVkn9J6dGJVd274g8J0iwspskyVFtZ4lJYlW7x9U3igznOkpePwQ 0hnUPZ2bqdAaQSB/OUUVJ0N/96xjzvnxTf9iW2dJZ3EPJRcKsr5Lfk9CT4wLbbaPmp04PFgaytr A68JokXpXnjOfk9PhvhTJlETwFatLqacXNFrXfG8NqrJoS6ONNYUIP25Q8hySUEBZ6fvffghUax fohotnQeb/0IXj9v3SHyFf0nFH27nGR3KNsIR6F8ugLM3OcXS0pwuSuv3GrttLbxLin9AXkJDR/ LBC6cP+KKlIPjW1kuS0R8DPWPrrJ2IfOcbfchXgFmWhB0+cm0dz7zkYjehmNpMql18rH35LCU/M Df8w3WnFfarW+KU+Y95fxcMsDnSHKEjbLik7ljbLTQKe5zNfZ4kVBQ4sCfZXJ13pJDyt44YotcP YiAvF8SfKIvCOh6a X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3ec8:b0:3ac:adce:60ad with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3ad86e96c9emr2886416a91.22.1792637865925; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (64.75.127.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.127.75.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3ada495315dsm2092370a91.15.2026.10.21.19.57.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 02:57:41 +0000 From: David Matlack To: Pasha Tatashin Cc: tarunsahu@google.com, Andrew Morton , joro@8bytes.org, Mike Rapoport , Pratyush Yadav , maz@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, jgg@nvidia.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, loganodell@google.com, oupton@kernel.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, alex@shazbot.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, will@kernel.org, Alexander Graf , Bjorn Helgaas , baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, sagis@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, skhawaja@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] liveupdate: Replace compatibility string with a 2-bit pair feature header Message-ID: References: <20261021152527.375070-1-tarunsahu@google.com> <20261021152527.375070-4-tarunsahu@google.com> <9huzecdi6go0.fsf@tarunix.c.googlers.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On 2026-10-21 09:26 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 7:28 PM David Matlack wrote: > > > > On 2026-10-21 02:50 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 2:47 PM David Matlack wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 11:40 AM wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Pasha Tatashin writes: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 11:25 AM Tarun Sahu wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> LUO and its file handlers validate handed-over state with monolithic > > > > > >> compatibility strings ("luo-v5", "memfd-v2"). Any change to a serialized > > > > > >> structure, even an optional additive one, must bump the string, which > > > > > >> breaks live update between adjacent kernels. Replace the string in > > > > > >> struct luo_ser with a feature header, so that the target kernel can > > > > > >> accept or reject the source kernel state per feature. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> struct luo_feature_hdr is a fixed 128-byte header: the serialized > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch is all wrong; 128 bytes is far too large. For every _ser > > > > > > struct, we only need 8 bytes instead. > > > > > > > > > > NOO, It is not. It is intended to avoid complex mess with unnecessary > > > > > over-engineering. > > > > > > 128-byte per serialized struct is not starter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first 4 bytes are the size, and the next 4 bytes are flags (i.e., > > > > > > 30 feature flags + 2 reserved bits for flags extension). The last two > > > > > > bits of the flags indicate whether an extended flags field is present. > > > > > > Each extended flags field is 8 bytes, and its last two bits indicate > > > > > > that yet another extended flags field follows. > > > > > > > > > > If we will have dynamic extension of flags, Think about this. > > > > > > > > To support dynamic extensions in a backward compatible way you want > > > > something like this: > > > > > > > > struct luo_feature_hdr { > > > > size > > > > flags > > > > > > __u32 size > > > __u32 flags > > > > > > > extensions // offset of first luo_feature_extensions (or 0) > > > > > > __u64 extensions[0] --> but the size should be specificed in > > > declaration macro that I showed in the next patch. > > > > I think you may have misunderstood what I meant. In my proposal, > > extensions is an offset to the first extension, not an array of > > extensions that immediately follow the header. > > > > If the extensions immediately follow the header, then the number of > > extensions is baked into the struct layout. Every field after them sits > > at an offset that depends on how many extensions there are. If we ever > > need one more extension, all the fields shift and old and new kernels > > can no longer read each other's struct. That is the problem Tarun > > We can structure it cleanly by nesting the payload: something like > struct { struct header {...}h; struct serialize_data { ... }p; }; > That way, the header can expand dynamically at the front, while all > fields inside `serialize_data` stay at fixed offsets relative to the > start > of the payload. > > Since the header size is self-describing via continuation bits (e.g., > the last two bits indicating whether another flag word follows), LUO > can > easily compute where the payload begins in the incoming blob. This > keeps the implementation simple, avoids linked lists of offsets. Oh interesting. I agree a dynamically sized header at the front can work and is simpler than a linked list. So the header and the payload need to be separate, and the payload is located with pointer arithmetic on the header. For example: struct luo_ser_hdr { u32 size; /* Size of the payload in bytes */ u32 flags; /* Bits [31:30] indicate an extension word follows */ /* u64 extension words follow while the continuation bits are set */ }; /* Size of the header, including any extension words. */ size_t luo_ser_hdr_size(const struct luo_ser_hdr *hdr); static inline void *luo_ser_payload(const struct luo_ser_hdr *hdr) { return (void *)hdr + luo_ser_hdr_size(hdr); } On preserve: hdr = kho_alloc_preserve(luo_ser_hdr_size_for(nr_ext) + sizeof(*ser)); luo_ser_hdr_init(hdr, sizeof(*ser), ...); ser = luo_ser_payload(hdr); ... args->serialized_data = virt_to_phys(hdr); On retrieve: hdr = phys_to_virt(args->serialized_data); err = luo_ser_hdr_validate(hdr, ...); if (err) return err; ser = luo_ser_payload(hdr); What would size mean in luo_ser_hdr? The size of the payload or the size of the combined luo_ser_hdr + payload. luo_ser_hdr is self describing so maybe it's just the size of the payload?