From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/56] microblaze_v2: Kconfig patches Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 15:24:25 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1209901305-6404-1-git-send-email-monstr@seznam.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:41740 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753128AbYEDVY2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2008 17:24:28 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so486431and.103 for ; Sun, 04 May 2008 14:24:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: monstr@seznam.cz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com, John.Linn@xilinx.com, john.williams@petalogix.com, matthew@wil.cx, will.newton@gmail.com, drepper@redhat.com, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, Michal Simek On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:40 AM, wrote: > From: Michal Simek > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..49767d1 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig > +config XILINX_UNCACHED_SHADOW > + bool "Are you using uncached shadow for RAM ?" > + depends on MICROBLAZE Isn't CONFIG_MICROBLAZE a given? > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/platform/Kconfig.platform b/arch/microblaze/platform/Kconfig.platform > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..64cbb80 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/microblaze/platform/Kconfig.platform > +config HACK > + bool "Increase performance" > + default y Is this appropriate for mainline? If so, it should have a better description. :-) Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.