From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
alan@linux.intel.com, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 74/76] x86/usercopy: Replace open coded stac/clac with __uaccess_{begin, end}
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 03:06:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lsq.1520823972.943057352@decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lsq.1520823971.5976735@decadent.org.uk>
3.16.56-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
commit b5c4ae4f35325d520b230bab6eb3310613b72ac1 upstream.
In preparation for converting some __uaccess_begin() instances to
__uacess_begin_nospec(), make sure all 'from user' uaccess paths are
using the _begin(), _end() helpers rather than open-coded stac() and
clac().
No functional changes.
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alan@linux.intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416438.33451.17309465232057176966.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- Convert several more functions to use __uaccess_begin_nospec(), that
are just wrappers in mainline
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
@@ -570,12 +570,12 @@ do { \
unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- stac();
+ __uaccess_begin();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user(to, from, n);
else
n = __copy_user_intel(to, from, n);
- clac();
+ __uaccess_end();
return n;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_to_user_ll);
@@ -583,12 +583,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_to_user_ll);
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- stac();
+ __uaccess_begin();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user_zeroing(to, from, n);
else
n = __copy_user_zeroing_intel(to, from, n);
- clac();
+ __uaccess_end();
return n;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll);
@@ -596,13 +596,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll);
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- stac();
+ __uaccess_begin();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user(to, from, n);
else
n = __copy_user_intel((void __user *)to,
(const void *)from, n);
- clac();
+ __uaccess_end();
return n;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nozero);
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nozero
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- stac();
+ __uaccess_begin();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2)
n = __copy_user_zeroing_intel_nocache(to, from, n);
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocach
#else
__copy_user_zeroing(to, from, n);
#endif
- clac();
+ __uaccess_end();
return n;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocache);
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocach
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- stac();
+ __uaccess_begin();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2)
n = __copy_user_intel_nocache(to, from, n);
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocach
#else
__copy_user(to, from, n);
#endif
- clac();
+ __uaccess_end();
return n;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <lsq.1520823971.5976735@decadent.org.uk>
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 54/76] x86: Introduce barrier_nospec Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 59/76] x86/spectre: Report get_user mitigation for spectre_v1 Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 70/76] nospec: Include <asm/barrier.h> dependency Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 75/76] x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 74/76] x86/usercopy: Replace open coded stac/clac with __uaccess_{begin, end} Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 69/76] nospec: Kill array_index_nospec_mask_check() Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 57/76] vfs, fdtable: Prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 73/76] x86: Introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 56/76] x86/syscall: Sanitize syscall table de-references under speculation Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 7:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2018-03-12 7:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2018-03-19 0:59 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-19 0:59 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 51/76] Documentation: Document array_index_nospec Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 52/76] array_index_nospec: Sanitize speculative array de-references Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 55/76] x86/get_user: Use pointer masking to limit speculation Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 53/76] x86: Implement array_index_mask_nospec Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` [PATCH 3.16 58/76] nl80211: Sanitize array index in parse_txq_params Ben Hutchings
2018-03-12 3:06 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=lsq.1520823972.943057352@decadent.org.uk \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox