From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:03:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20141111064417.GT23575@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Milosz Tanski's message of "Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:02:00 -0500") Sender: owner-linux-aio@kvack.org To: Milosz Tanski Cc: Dave Chinner , LKML , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-aio@kvack.org" , Mel Gorman , Volker Lendecke , Tejun Heo , Theodore Ts'o , Al Viro , Linux API , Michael Kerrisk , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Milosz Tanski writes: >> Can you write a test (or set of) for fstests that exercises this new >> functionality? I'm not worried about performance, just >> correctness.... > > Sure thing. Can you point me at the fstests repo? A quick google > search reveals lots of projects named fstests, most of them abandoned. I think he's referring to xfstests. Still, I think that's the wrong place for functional testing. ltp would be better, imo. Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: aart@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38447 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751018AbaKKREJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:04:09 -0500 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only) References: <20141111064417.GT23575@dastard> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:03:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Milosz Tanski's message of "Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:02:00 -0500") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Milosz Tanski Cc: Dave Chinner , LKML , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-aio@kvack.org" , Mel Gorman , Volker Lendecke , Tejun Heo , Theodore Ts'o , Al Viro , Linux API , Michael Kerrisk , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20141111170314.CVM__3ET68zX3aLfV_klhKYCeChLnvH_qSow54JsaEY@z> Milosz Tanski writes: >> Can you write a test (or set of) for fstests that exercises this new >> functionality? I'm not worried about performance, just >> correctness.... > > Sure thing. Can you point me at the fstests repo? A quick google > search reveals lots of projects named fstests, most of them abandoned. I think he's referring to xfstests. Still, I think that's the wrong place for functional testing. ltp would be better, imo. Cheers, Jeff