From: leif.lindholm@arm.com (Leif Lindholm)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Add SWP/SWPB emulation for ARMv7 processors
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:15:24 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001ca7fec$8aca3ec0$a05ebc40$@lindholm@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13B9B4C6EF24D648824FF11BE896716203A7FA69CC@dlee02.ent.ti.com>
Thanks for the feedback.
> From: Woodruff, Richard [mailto:r-woodruff2 at ti.com]
> Sent: 17 December 2009 18:20
> Still, the exclusive operations for some systems don't extend beyond an
> ARM smp-cluster. Not all cores and interconnect implementations support
> the range lock. As such from a SOC point of view SWP still has value
> as it may exist where lwrex/swrex would fail. It is also much lighter
> than using some kind of mailbox alternative.
>
> While the ARM is important to many SOCs its not the whole thing. I've
> seen some side threads where people are busy blindly removing SWP and
> quoting half information.
There is nothing half about SWP/SWPB being deprecated from ARMv6 onwards.
Also, not all systems properly implement the bus locking support required
for SWP to be properly atomic externally.
> My main comment on patch in this regard is to make the point you won't
> be able to fully emulate a SWP with the sequence you posted if you
> consider other cores outside the ARM cluster. Some note to that effect
> would be positive in the description.
I would argue that this is not a property of the patch, but rather the
architectural deprecation of the instruction(s).
However, I take your point. What if I add a comment that this emulation
will not work on uncached memory regions where no global exclusive
monitor is implemented?
Regards
/
Leif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 17:54 [PATCH] ARM: Add SWP/SWPB emulation for ARMv7 processors Leif Lindholm
2009-12-17 18:19 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-12-17 19:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-12-17 20:43 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-12-18 20:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-01-08 23:20 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-12-18 14:15 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2009-12-17 19:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-12-18 10:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-12-18 10:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-12-18 17:01 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001ca7fec$8aca3ec0$a05ebc40$@lindholm@arm.com' \
--to=leif.lindholm@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).