From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add new CPU initialization support
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:09:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001cb26d6$b2a3fee0$17ebfca0$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100716115219.GD17952@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:58:28PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5pv310/platsmp.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..9325ac2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
> > +/* linux/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > + * http://www.samsung.com/
> > + *
> > + * Cloned from linux/arch/arm/mach-realview/platsmp.c
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2002 ARM Ltd.
> > + * All Rights Reserved
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> > +#include <asm/mach-types.h>
> > +#include <asm/localtimer.h>
> > +#include <asm/unified.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/smp_scu.h>
> > +#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> > +
> > +extern void s5pv310_secondary_startup(void);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * control for which core is the next to come out of the secondary
> > + * boot "holding pen"
> > + */
> > +volatile int __cpuinitdata pen_release = -1;
> > +
> > +static void __iomem *scu_base_addr(void)
> > +{
> > + return (void __iomem *)(S5P_VA_SCU);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned int get_core_count(void)
> > +{
> > + void __iomem *scu_base = scu_base_addr();
> > + if (scu_base)
> > + return scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock);
> > +
> > +void __cpuinit platform_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + trace_hardirqs_off();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * if any interrupts are already enabled for the primary
> > + * core (e.g. timer irq), then they will not have been enabled
> > + * for us: do so
> > + */
> > + gic_cpu_init(0, gic_cpu_base_addr);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * let the primary processor know we're out of the
> > + * pen, then head off into the C entry point
> > + */
> > + pen_release = -1;
> > + smp_wmb();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Synchronise with the boot thread.
> > + */
> > + spin_lock(&boot_lock);
> > + spin_unlock(&boot_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int __cpuinit boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct
*idle)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long timeout;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * set synchronisation state between this boot processor
> > + * and the secondary one
> > + */
> > + spin_lock(&boot_lock);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The secondary processor is waiting to be released from
> > + * the holding pen - release it, then wait for it to flag
> > + * that it has been released by resetting pen_release.
> > + *
> > + * Note that "pen_release" is the hardware CPU ID, whereas
> > + * "cpu" is Linux's internal ID.
> > + */
> > + pen_release = cpu;
> > + flush_cache_all();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * XXX
> > + *
> > + * This is a later addition to the booting protocol: the
> > + * bootMonitor now puts secondary cores into WFI, so
> > + * poke_milo() no longer gets the cores moving; we need
> > + * to send a soft interrupt to wake the secondary core.
> > + * Use smp_cross_call() for this, since there's little
> > + * point duplicating the code here
> > + */
> > + smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu));
> > +
> > + timeout = jiffies + (1 * HZ);
> > + while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> > + smp_rmb();
> > + if (pen_release == -1)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + udelay(10);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * now the secondary core is starting up let it run its
> > + * calibrations, then wait for it to finish
> > + */
> > + spin_unlock(&boot_lock);
> > +
> > + return pen_release != -1 ? -ENOSYS : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __init poke_milo(void)
> > +{
> > + /* nobody is to be released from the pen yet */
> > + pen_release = -1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Write the address of secondary startup into the system-wide flags
> > + * register. The BootMonitor waits for this register to become
> > + * non-zero.
> > + */
> > + __raw_writel(BSYM(virt_to_phys(s5pv310_secondary_startup)),
> S5P_INFORM0);
> > +
> > + mb();
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs
> > + * which may be present or become present in the system.
> > + */
> > +void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int i, ncores = get_core_count();
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ncores; i++)
> > + set_cpu_possible(i, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int ncores = get_core_count();
> > + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /* sanity check */
> > + if (ncores == 0) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR
> > + "Realview: strange CM count of 0? Default to 1\n");
> > +
> > + ncores = 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ncores > NR_CPUS) {
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING
> > + "Realview: no. of cores (%d) greater than configured
"
> > + "maximum of %d - clipping\n",
> > + ncores, NR_CPUS);
> > + ncores = NR_CPUS;
> > + }
> > +
> > + smp_store_cpu_info(cpu);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * are we trying to boot more cores than exist?
> > + */
> > + if (max_cpus > ncores)
> > + max_cpus = ncores;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Initialise the present map, which describes the set of CPUs
> > + * actually populated at the present time.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++)
> > + set_cpu_present(i, true);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Initialise the SCU if there are more than one CPU and let
> > + * them know where to start. Note that, on modern versions of
> > + * MILO, the "poke" doesn't actually do anything until each
> > + * individual core is sent a soft interrupt to get it out of
> > + * WFI
> > + */
> > + if (max_cpus > 1) {
> > + /*
> > + * Enable the local timer or broadcast device for the
> > + * boot CPU, but only if we have more than one CPU.
> > + */
> > + percpu_timer_setup();
> > +
> > + scu_enable(scu_base_addr());
> > + poke_milo();
> > + }
> > +}
>
> Please can you model this on the Versatile Express platsmp.c rather than
> the Realview platsmp.c ?
>
Sure, will do it.
> The Realview platsmp.c implementation contains a lot of left-overs from
> the initial Integrator-based SMP implementation which we really shouldn't
> be carrying endlessly forward.
Oh, I didn't know/check about that.
Thanks for your information and inputs.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-16 8:58 [PATCH v2 0/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add support for Samsung S5PV310 SoC Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ARM: S5P: Remove fixed uart offset dependent code Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add new CPU initialization support Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 10:58 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-07-16 11:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-17 3:52 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-07-19 0:09 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add Clock and PLL support Kukjin Kim
2010-07-27 6:24 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-27 9:06 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-27 10:43 ` MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add IRQ support Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add Timer support Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 10:30 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-07-20 12:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-26 4:07 ` 김상범
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add new Kconfig and Makefiles Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add Board support file Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 10:36 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-07-21 12:33 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add serial port support Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001cb26d6$b2a3fee0$17ebfca0$%kim@samsung.com' \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).