linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: v6k: introduce CPU_V6K option
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:22:05 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000901cbb723$775245d0$65f6d170$@deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110118133559.GC10997@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:09:22AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I'd rather not in this patch - this patch adds CPU_V6K as an alias for
> > CPU_V6 - so eveywhere which referenced CPU_V6 becomes (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K).
> > We could remove it in a later patch though.
> 
> Here's a follow-up patch to do that.  There's a few other things which
> could do with updating now that we have CPU_Vx* straightened out.  I've
> also recently noticed that the v6 and v7 cache stuff doesn't use the
> direct-call optimization (see commented out bits in cacheflush.h).
> 
> That was because my original V6 support used the block cache operations,
> which had to be run-time tested for presence, and so modified the
> global cpu_cache methods directly.  As the block cache stuff was dropped,
> we should re-enable this optimization.
> 
> That said, I'd rather not add too much to this series as I think it needs
> to go into mainline ASAP - and probably stable as well, even though it's
> on the large side - once properly and fully tested.

Understood. Pruning the Kconfig is an optimisation and can be done once
the initial bulk is merged.
 
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: v6k: DMA_CACHE_RWFO isn't appropriate for non-v6k CPUs
> 
> Limit DMA_CACHE_RWFO to only v6k SMP CPUs - V6 CPUs aren't SMP capable,
> so the read/write for ownership work-around doesn't apply to them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> index 843bc8c..808b832 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ config NEEDS_SYSCALL_FOR_CMPXCHG
> 
>  config DMA_CACHE_RWFO
>  	bool "Enable read/write for ownership DMA cache maintenance"
> -	depends on (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K) && SMP
> +	depends on CPU_V6K && SMP
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	  The Snoop Control Unit on ARM11MPCore does not detect the

Looks good to me:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-18 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17 19:20 [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  6:00   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 14:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 18:20       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 15:11     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-25 19:50   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  5:42   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  0:16   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  4:44     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  9:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24  8:38         ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:57           ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 10:28             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 13:47               ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 14:11                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 14:54                   ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 15:00                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 14:11       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:19         ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <000601cbbc97$cc6955d0$653c0170$%deacon@arm.com>
2011-01-25 21:38       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 19:51   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:13   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 16:43   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 16:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 17:33       ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 17:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 21:21           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 11:11             ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 12:44               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 17:25                 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups Dave P. Martin
2011-01-26 21:31                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 14:37                     ` [PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups " Dave Martin
2011-01-27 16:46                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 14:22                   ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 12:56                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 14:11                       ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:13                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:46                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 18:29                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 19:11                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11  9:33                                 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 10:13                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 10:52                                     ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:05                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:17                                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:32                                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-16 16:35                                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-18 17:52                                               ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 15:42               ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 15:52                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 16:59                   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 21:06                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 11:44                       ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: v6k: introduce CPU_V6K option Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:14   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:36   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 11:09     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 13:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:22         ` Will Deacon [this message]
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: v6k: Realview EB 11MPCore and PB11MPCore use V6K architecture CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: v6k: Dove platforms " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:39   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: v6k: select clear exclusive code seqences according to V6 variants Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:15   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: v6k: select cmpxchg code sequences " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:18   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: v6k: select generic atomic64 code " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:21   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:24   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: v6k: select TLS register " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:23   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  4:27         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:25       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:21     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: v6k: use CPU domain feature if we include support for arch < ARMv6K Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:03   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:23     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-27 18:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-27 18:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28  9:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28  9:59         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 10:46           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 11:06             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 12:25               ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:05                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:10                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:22                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:21                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 15:11                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 16:49                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: v6k: do not disable CPU_32v6K based on platform selection Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: v6k: allow swp emulation again when ARMv7 is enabled Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: v6k: only allow SMP if we have v6k or v7 CPU Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:25   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 22:21 ` [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 14:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:40   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:44     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 15:01       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:47   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:58     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 20:43       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09  0:35         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09  6:04           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09  9:48             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09 10:00               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:24                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 16:27                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:32                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:44                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:45                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 17:48                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 10:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:04       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:12         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:16           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 20:45           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-11 21:07             ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000901cbb723$775245d0$65f6d170$@deacon@arm.com' \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).