linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jingoohan1@gmail.com (Jingoo Han)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: designware: add memory barrier after enabling region
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:36:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b01d13cb5$5bb6d170$13247450$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151211134857.03601d0e@xhacker>

On Friday, December 11, 2015 2:49 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:35:10 +0530 Pratyush Anand wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >> > >       dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2);
> > >> > > +     /*
> > >> > > +      * ensure that the ATU enable has been happaned before accessing
> > >> > > +      * pci configuration/io spaces through dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write].
> > >> > > +      */
> > >> > > +     wmb();
> > >> > >  }
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> My understnading is that since writel() of dw_pcie_writel_rc() in
> > >> above code and readl(), writel() of dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write]() (which
> > >> will follow) goes through same device (ie PCIe host here). So, it is
> > >> guaranteed that 1st writel() will be executed before later
> > >> readl()/writel(). If that is true then we do not need any explicit
> > >> barrier here.
> > >>
> > >> Arnd, Russel: whats your opinion here.
> > >               ^l
> >
> > Sorry :(
> >
> > >
> > > writel() has a barrier _before_ the access but not after.
> > >
> > > The fact is that there's nothing which guarantees that the write will hit
> > > the hardware in a timely manner (forget any rules about PCI config space,
> > > the PCI ordering rules apply to the PCI bus, not to the ARM buses.)
> > >
> > > If you need this write to have hit the hardware before continuing, you
> > > need to read back from the same register.
> >
> > OK, so better to replace wmb() with read back of control register.
> >
> > >
> > > I'm just looking at this driver, trying to decipher what it's doing.  It
> > > _looks_ to me like it's reprogramming one of the outbound windows (IO?)
> > > so that configuration space can be accessed.  Doesn't this have the
> > > effect of disabling access to the IO segment of the PCI bus from the
> > > host CPU?
> > >
> > > What protections are there against other CPUs in the system issuing a
> > > PCI I/O read/write while this outbound window is programmed as
> > > configuration space?
> >
> >
> > Yes, that is an issue with this driver. Most of the host controller
> > has 4 or more viewpoints, and it is very easy to handle for them. But
> > there are few which has only two viewpoints. Do not know how to solve
> > it, so that it works for all.
> >
> 
> The default outbound iATU number is two, this may be the reason why the driver
> is written in current style. And two outbound iATUs may be common for pcie dw
> users because ASIC people just follow the default configuration ;).
> 
> In our case, Marvell Berlin SoCs have two outbound iATUs.

Hmm, we need to add new DT property to handle the number of outbound iATUs.
Then, 'pcie-designware.c' should configure registers according to the number.
Anyway, we should add this agenda to ToDo list.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> Thanks,
> Jisheng

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03 13:35 [PATCH v4 0/5] Qualcomm PCIe driver and designware fixes Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: designware: add memory barrier after enabling region Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-08  9:01   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-09  4:40     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-09  9:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-09 10:29         ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-09 10:23       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-11  4:05         ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-11  5:48           ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-22 12:36             ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2015-12-17 15:45           ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 15:51             ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] DT: PCI: qcom: Document PCIe devicetree bindings Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 20:42   ` Rob Herring
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe controller driver Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-15  8:24   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-16 21:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-16 21:53   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-17 13:18     ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 21:15       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: dts: apq8064: add pcie devicetree node Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: ifc6410: enable pcie dt node for this board Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 21:55   ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-18  9:57     ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-07 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Qualcomm PCIe driver and designware fixes Srinivas Kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000b01d13cb5$5bb6d170$13247450$@com' \
    --to=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).