From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:16:25 -0000 Subject: [PATCH] nmk-gpio: use request_irq instead of chained handler In-Reply-To: References: <1298465690-27077-1-git-send-email-rabin.vincent@stericsson.com> <-6148324460357957969@unknownmsgid> <5890487119819559395@unknownmsgid> Message-ID: <000c01cbd50f$bbc24d50$3346e7f0$@deacon@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, > 2011/2/23 Will Deacon : > >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 22:47, Will Deacon wrote: > >> >> __nmk_gpio_irq_handler doesn't do anything more that what a normal handler > >> >> does, so it can become one. ?This is also needed for changing the GIC > >> >> implementation to a different flow handler. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent > >> > > >> > mach-nomadik only seems to use the vic. Why does this GPIO handler > >> > need updating? > >> > >> plat-nomadik/gpio.c is also used by mach-ux500, which uses the GIC. > > > > Ah yes, sorry I missed that one. I'm happy to include any patches from you > > in the GIC fasteoi series if it makes merging easier. > > OK if this one is OK I sure prefer that you take it in your series Will, > since you have the whole picture of what you want to do with the > GIC. > > It'll likely collide with the stuff I have stacked up for the 2.6.39 merge > window though, which will be pull-requested any day now. Sure. I'll add a patch to my series that makes the minimal change required and post it next week. Will