linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init
       [not found] <1295968956-10166-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com>
@ 2011-01-25 15:28 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
  2011-01-25 16:09   ` Will Deacon
                     ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hiremath, Vaibhav @ 2011-01-25 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:53 PM
> To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; Varadarajan, Charulatha
> Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller
> in board_init
> 
> With addition of hwmod support to gpio, the ethernet controller
> goes undetected for OMAP35xEVM. So explicitly assert the reset signal to
> ethernet controller smsc911x -
> 
> 	- GPIO7 (>=RevG version of EVM's)
> 	- GPIO64 (<=RevD version of EVM's)
> 
> This patch is based on intial version from Charulatha V, reference
> to original discussion -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg35784.html
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> ---
> Since Kevin reported that this patch doesn't get applied cleanly,
> so I am reposting it again after making sure that it gets applied cleanly.
> 
[Hiremath, Vaibhav] Oops, missed linux-arm-kernel list, adding here.

Not sure whether I need to repost keeping linux-arm-kernel?

Thanks,
Vaibhav

>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c |   39
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/board-omap3evm.c
> index 323c380..97e0f65 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@
>  #define OMAP3EVM_ETHR_ID_REV	0x50
>  #define OMAP3EVM_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ	176
>  #define OMAP3EVM_SMSC911X_CS	5
> +/*
> + * Eth Reset signal
> + *	64 = Generation 1 (<=RevD)
> + *	7 = Generation 2 (>=RevE)
> + */
> +#define OMAP3EVM_GEN1_ETHR_GPIO_RST	64
> +#define OMAP3EVM_GEN2_ETHR_GPIO_RST	7
> 
>  static u8 omap3_evm_version;
> 
> @@ -124,10 +131,15 @@ static struct platform_device
> omap3evm_smsc911x_device = {
> 
>  static inline void __init omap3evm_init_smsc911x(void)
>  {
> -	int eth_cs;
> +	int eth_cs, eth_rst;
>  	struct clk *l3ck;
>  	unsigned int rate;
> 
> +	if (get_omap3_evm_rev() == OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_1)
> +		eth_rst = OMAP3EVM_GEN1_ETHR_GPIO_RST;
> +	else
> +		eth_rst = OMAP3EVM_GEN2_ETHR_GPIO_RST;
> +
>  	eth_cs = OMAP3EVM_SMSC911X_CS;
> 
>  	l3ck = clk_get(NULL, "l3_ck");
> @@ -136,6 +148,27 @@ static inline void __init
> omap3evm_init_smsc911x(void)
>  	else
>  		rate = clk_get_rate(l3ck);
> 
> +	/* Configure ethernet controller reset gpio */
> +	if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> +		if (gpio_request(eth_rst, "SMSC911x gpio") < 0) {
> +			pr_err(KERN_ERR "Failed to request %d for smsc911x\n",
> +					eth_rst);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (gpio_direction_output(eth_rst, 1) < 0) {
> +			pr_err(KERN_ERR "Failed to set direction of %d for" \
> +					" smsc911x\n", eth_rst);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +		/* reset pulse to ethernet controller*/
> +		usleep_range(150, 220);
> +		gpio_set_value(eth_rst, 0);
> +		usleep_range(150, 220);
> +		gpio_set_value(eth_rst, 1);
> +		usleep_range(1, 2);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (gpio_request(OMAP3EVM_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ, "SMSC911x irq") < 0) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO%d for smsc911x IRQ\n",
>  			OMAP3EVM_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ);
> @@ -658,6 +691,10 @@ static struct omap_board_mux board_mux[] __initdata =
> {
>  				OMAP_PIN_OFF_WAKEUPENABLE),
>  	OMAP3_MUX(MCSPI1_CS1, OMAP_MUX_MODE4 | OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP |
>  				OMAP_PIN_OFF_INPUT_PULLUP |
> OMAP_PIN_OFF_OUTPUT_LOW),
> +	OMAP3_MUX(SYS_BOOT5, OMAP_MUX_MODE4 | OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP |
> +				OMAP_PIN_OFF_NONE),
> +	OMAP3_MUX(GPMC_WAIT2, OMAP_MUX_MODE4 | OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP |
> +				OMAP_PIN_OFF_NONE),
>  	{ .reg_offset = OMAP_MUX_TERMINATOR },
>  };
>  #endif
> --
> 1.6.2.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init
  2011-01-25 15:28 ` [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init Hiremath, Vaibhav
@ 2011-01-25 16:09   ` Will Deacon
  2011-01-27 19:58   ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-01-27 20:08   ` Kevin Hilman
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2011-01-25 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hello,

> > Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller
> > in board_init
> >
> > With addition of hwmod support to gpio, the ethernet controller
> > goes undetected for OMAP35xEVM. So explicitly assert the reset signal to
> > ethernet controller smsc911x -
> >
> > 	- GPIO7 (>=RevG version of EVM's)
> > 	- GPIO64 (<=RevD version of EVM's)
> >
> > This patch is based on intial version from Charulatha V, reference
> > to original discussion -
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg35784.html
> > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
> > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Out of interest - have you tried this network chip (smsc9118) in an SMP
environment [is it on OMAP4?]? On the Versatile Express it's quite easy to
get it to `lock up'. It claims to be servicing interrupts but you certainly
don't get any useful packets. and ifdown/ifup brings it back to life again.

I took a brief look at the driver and found a few issues there:

1.) Read-after-read and read-after-write minimum delays aren't respected
2.) The locking is too low-level (it's around the register accessors) so
    there is plenty of scope for deadlock if a calling function holds some
    other locks too.
3.) FIFO fastforwarding uses the word count instead of the byte count.
4.) Bit 20 of the HW_CFG register apparently always needs to be asserted,
    but it's 0 out of reset (who knows what they were thinking?!).

I tried to resolve these problems (admittedly as a quick bit of hacking)
but the issue persists.

Anyway, it would just be nice to know if anybody else has seen problems
with this chip/driver because it makes the Versatile Express pretty much
useless as a remote box.

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init
  2011-01-25 15:28 ` [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init Hiremath, Vaibhav
  2011-01-25 16:09   ` Will Deacon
@ 2011-01-27 19:58   ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-01-27 20:08   ` Kevin Hilman
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-01-27 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

"Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:53 PM
>> To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; Varadarajan, Charulatha
>> Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller
>> in board_init
>> 
>> With addition of hwmod support to gpio, the ethernet controller
>> goes undetected for OMAP35xEVM. So explicitly assert the reset signal to
>> ethernet controller smsc911x -
>> 
>> 	- GPIO7 (>=RevG version of EVM's)
>> 	- GPIO64 (<=RevD version of EVM's)
>> 
>> This patch is based on intial version from Charulatha V, reference
>> to original discussion -
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg35784.html
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Since Kevin reported that this patch doesn't get applied cleanly,
>> so I am reposting it again after making sure that it gets applied cleanly.
>> 
> [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Oops, missed linux-arm-kernel list, adding here.
>
> Not sure whether I need to repost keeping linux-arm-kernel?

Yes, please repost.

Kevin

>
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c |   39
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-
>> omap2/board-omap3evm.c
>> index 323c380..97e0f65 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@
>>  #define OMAP3EVM_ETHR_ID_REV	0x50
>>  #define OMAP3EVM_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ	176
>>  #define OMAP3EVM_SMSC911X_CS	5
>> +/*
>> + * Eth Reset signal
>> + *	64 = Generation 1 (<=RevD)
>> + *	7 = Generation 2 (>=RevE)
>> + */
>> +#define OMAP3EVM_GEN1_ETHR_GPIO_RST	64
>> +#define OMAP3EVM_GEN2_ETHR_GPIO_RST	7
>> 
>>  static u8 omap3_evm_version;
>> 
>> @@ -124,10 +131,15 @@ static struct platform_device
>> omap3evm_smsc911x_device = {
>> 
>>  static inline void __init omap3evm_init_smsc911x(void)
>>  {
>> -	int eth_cs;
>> +	int eth_cs, eth_rst;
>>  	struct clk *l3ck;
>>  	unsigned int rate;
>> 
>> +	if (get_omap3_evm_rev() == OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_1)
>> +		eth_rst = OMAP3EVM_GEN1_ETHR_GPIO_RST;
>> +	else
>> +		eth_rst = OMAP3EVM_GEN2_ETHR_GPIO_RST;
>> +
>>  	eth_cs = OMAP3EVM_SMSC911X_CS;
>> 
>>  	l3ck = clk_get(NULL, "l3_ck");
>> @@ -136,6 +148,27 @@ static inline void __init
>> omap3evm_init_smsc911x(void)
>>  	else
>>  		rate = clk_get_rate(l3ck);
>> 
>> +	/* Configure ethernet controller reset gpio */
>> +	if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
>> +		if (gpio_request(eth_rst, "SMSC911x gpio") < 0) {
>> +			pr_err(KERN_ERR "Failed to request %d for smsc911x\n",
>> +					eth_rst);
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (gpio_direction_output(eth_rst, 1) < 0) {
>> +			pr_err(KERN_ERR "Failed to set direction of %d for" \
>> +					" smsc911x\n", eth_rst);
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>> +		/* reset pulse to ethernet controller*/
>> +		usleep_range(150, 220);
>> +		gpio_set_value(eth_rst, 0);
>> +		usleep_range(150, 220);
>> +		gpio_set_value(eth_rst, 1);
>> +		usleep_range(1, 2);
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	if (gpio_request(OMAP3EVM_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ, "SMSC911x irq") < 0) {
>>  		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO%d for smsc911x IRQ\n",
>>  			OMAP3EVM_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ);
>> @@ -658,6 +691,10 @@ static struct omap_board_mux board_mux[] __initdata =
>> {
>>  				OMAP_PIN_OFF_WAKEUPENABLE),
>>  	OMAP3_MUX(MCSPI1_CS1, OMAP_MUX_MODE4 | OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP |
>>  				OMAP_PIN_OFF_INPUT_PULLUP |
>> OMAP_PIN_OFF_OUTPUT_LOW),
>> +	OMAP3_MUX(SYS_BOOT5, OMAP_MUX_MODE4 | OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP |
>> +				OMAP_PIN_OFF_NONE),
>> +	OMAP3_MUX(GPMC_WAIT2, OMAP_MUX_MODE4 | OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP |
>> +				OMAP_PIN_OFF_NONE),
>>  	{ .reg_offset = OMAP_MUX_TERMINATOR },
>>  };
>>  #endif
>> --
>> 1.6.2.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init
  2011-01-25 15:28 ` [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init Hiremath, Vaibhav
  2011-01-25 16:09   ` Will Deacon
  2011-01-27 19:58   ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2011-01-27 20:08   ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-01-29 12:11     ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-01-27 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

"Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:53 PM
>> To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; Varadarajan, Charulatha
>> Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller
>> in board_init
>> 
>> With addition of hwmod support to gpio, the ethernet controller
>> goes undetected for OMAP35xEVM. So explicitly assert the reset signal to
>> ethernet controller smsc911x -
>> 
>> 	- GPIO7 (>=RevG version of EVM's)
>> 	- GPIO64 (<=RevD version of EVM's)
>> 
>> This patch is based on intial version from Charulatha V, reference
>> to original discussion -
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg35784.html
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Since Kevin reported that this patch doesn't get applied cleanly,
>> so I am reposting it again after making sure that it gets applied cleanly.
>> 
> [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Oops, missed linux-arm-kernel list, adding here.
>
> Not sure whether I need to repost keeping linux-arm-kernel?
>

Also, did you post the smc911x driver fix yet that is needed for testing
with newer kernels?

Kevin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init
  2011-01-27 20:08   ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2011-01-29 12:11     ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hiremath, Vaibhav @ 2011-01-29 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hilman, Kevin
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 1:38 AM
> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Varadarajan, Charulatha; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet
> controller in board_init
> 
> "Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com> writes:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:53 PM
> >> To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; Varadarajan, Charulatha
> >> Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet
> controller
> >> in board_init
> >>
> >> With addition of hwmod support to gpio, the ethernet controller
> >> goes undetected for OMAP35xEVM. So explicitly assert the reset signal
> to
> >> ethernet controller smsc911x -
> >>
> >> 	- GPIO7 (>=RevG version of EVM's)
> >> 	- GPIO64 (<=RevD version of EVM's)
> >>
> >> This patch is based on intial version from Charulatha V, reference
> >> to original discussion -
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg35784.html
> >> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
> >> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >> Since Kevin reported that this patch doesn't get applied cleanly,
> >> so I am reposting it again after making sure that it gets applied
> cleanly.
> >>
> > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Oops, missed linux-arm-kernel list, adding here.
> >
> > Not sure whether I need to repost keeping linux-arm-kernel?
> >
> 
> Also, did you post the smc911x driver fix yet that is needed for testing
> with newer kernels?
> 
[Hiremath, Vaibhav] Not yet. Got completely loaded with some high priority issues. I will try to post it sometime this week.

Thanks,
Vaibhav

> Kevin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-29 12:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1295968956-10166-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com>
2011-01-25 15:28 ` [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-01-25 16:09   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-27 19:58   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-27 20:08   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-29 12:11     ` Hiremath, Vaibhav

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).