From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pullip.cho@samsung.com (Cho KyongHo)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:49:18 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v11 01/27] iommu/exynos: do not include removed header
In-Reply-To: <CAK9yfHzRasE3jroDUZgAa=DN5N=2ZDAxgNiHDCip+f2868BAVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140314140129.68a41cc1bd9e0a48a198ca13@samsung.com>
 <CAK9yfHzRasE3jroDUZgAa=DN5N=2ZDAxgNiHDCip+f2868BAVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <000e01cf3f7b$6edcdfd0$4c969f70$@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.kamat at linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:00 PM
> 
> On 14 March 2014 10:31, Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Commit 25e9d28d92 (ARM: EXYNOS: remove system mmu initialization from
> > exynos tree) removed arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach/sysmmu.h header without
> > removing remaining use of it from exynos-iommu driver, thus causing a
> > compilation error.
> >
> > This patch fixes the error by removing respective include line
> > from exynos-iommu.c.
> >
> > CC: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c |    3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> > index 0740189..4876d35 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >  #define DEBUG
> >  #endif
> >
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> 
> This change doesn't look related to the patch subject/description.
> 
Yes. But it is simply added without any side-effect.
Do you think it should be in a separate patch?.
Actually, the added line is a redundant.

Regards,

KyongHo.