From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pullip.cho@samsung.com (KyongHo Cho)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:24:56 +0900
Subject: Why don't we have atomic_set_mask()?
In-Reply-To: <20110317120950.GI29758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <AANLkTi=V5mHHibKftXZ1A+s6xiuqH5X0pqYPMjZod6EV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110317120950.GI29758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <000f01cbe49e$56cbbeb0$04633c10$%cho@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:36:15PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > arch/arm/asm/atomic.h defines atomic_clear_mask() but its counterpart,
> > atomic_set_mask() is not defined.
> >
> > Don't we need it?
> 
> I can't reply to you:
> 
> | A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> | recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> |
> |   pullip.cho at samsung.com
> |     SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
> |     host mailin.samsung.com [203.254.224.12]: 550 esmtp:
> |     protocol deviation
> 
> Which basically means that Samsung's MTA is currently broken.

I think it is currently ok because I just sent an email from gmail to
@samsung.com.

Thank you!

KyongHo.